Newbie folks asking what art is best for self-defense…

Holmejr

Black Belt
And what they don’t typically consider.

I believe virtually any legitimate martial art is good for self defense, supposing the fighter is well trained. I believe what is typically missing in the question is the surprise factor. After attempting to de-escalate and if truly physically threatened, we don’t go into sparring mode, striking our best stance with fists clenched. We don’t give ourselves away, but explode as needed. They don’t know what we know and we don’t show them beforehand. Of course there are extreme exceptions like fighting a whole gang in south central or when the perpetrators girlfriend jumps on your back…

Whatcha think?
 
The more I see it asked, the more I think it's a silly question to ask online.

So you do your research and you think that Baguazhang Kung Fu is the best martial art for you. Then you look up, and the nearest Baguazhang school is 300 miles away.

Then you look at what is actually available near you, and you ask online, "What martial art is best? I have Jiu-Jitsu and Taekwondo." The vast majority of folks say "Jiu-Jitsu is better". So you go to that school, even though when you walk in you get a bad vibe. Then 3 months later some scandal comes out and the gym is turned upside down.

What people should be doing is trialing classes until they find a school they like. That's the most important. And then over time if there are things you don't like about it, or things you see online that you wish you could do, you can make the change then.
 
The best art for self defense is the art that you will be the most motivated to train.

If you won't show up and train, it does not matter how effective it could have been, had you actually trained. The art that you train the most in, will be the most effective for you. So, pick the school that you will go to, on a regular basis and train at.... that will be the most effective art.
 
And what they don’t typically consider.

I believe virtually any legitimate martial art is good for self defense, supposing the fighter is well trained. I believe what is typically missing in the question is the surprise factor. After attempting to de-escalate and if truly physically threatened, we don’t go into sparring mode, striking our best stance with fists clenched. We don’t give ourselves away, but explode as needed. They don’t know what we know and we don’t show them beforehand. Of course there are extreme exceptions like fighting a whole gang in south central or when the perpetrators girlfriend jumps on your back…

Whatcha think?
I do.

I don't see the the point in fighting in a sub optimal way just because it is self defence.
 
The best art for self defense is the art that you will be the most motivated to train.

If you won't show up and train, it does not matter how effective it could have been, had you actually trained. The art that you train the most in, will be the most effective for you. So, pick the school that you will go to, on a regular basis and train at.... that will be the most effective art.
People hate the process that makes them good at something.

That is a common theme for elite athletes.
 
Back
Top