RandomPhantom700
Master of Arts
I'm coming up with moral hypotheticals out of boredom, can you tell I'm still in college?
Anway, Bob, Dan, and Jim are all three in the same martial arts class. They are of equal skill level, all three have a wife, 2.5 kids and a dog, and all three are of rougly equal socioeconomic status. Bob and Dan hate each-other, and it's pretty well known and acknowledged in the martial arts class.
One night, heading down the street, Bob comes upon Dan and Jim, each on separate sides of the street being attacked by 2 thugs each. Having been taken by surprise, they are losing; Bob realizes that he has to help, and only has time to save one. Given that he has equal chance of success helping either, and that all other factors are equal, Bob decides to go with his feelings about Dan and rescues Jim. Dan, as a result, is beaten mercilessly before either of the other two can recover and dies later on.
No I'm not a martial artist, and yes you can debate about the likelihood and accuracy of this situation until you're blue in the face. It is, after all, a hypothetical. What I'm curious about is whether you think that, given that his dislike for Dan was the only unequal factor, Bob is still morally culpable for having made the decision based on that?
Thank ye.
Anway, Bob, Dan, and Jim are all three in the same martial arts class. They are of equal skill level, all three have a wife, 2.5 kids and a dog, and all three are of rougly equal socioeconomic status. Bob and Dan hate each-other, and it's pretty well known and acknowledged in the martial arts class.
One night, heading down the street, Bob comes upon Dan and Jim, each on separate sides of the street being attacked by 2 thugs each. Having been taken by surprise, they are losing; Bob realizes that he has to help, and only has time to save one. Given that he has equal chance of success helping either, and that all other factors are equal, Bob decides to go with his feelings about Dan and rescues Jim. Dan, as a result, is beaten mercilessly before either of the other two can recover and dies later on.
No I'm not a martial artist, and yes you can debate about the likelihood and accuracy of this situation until you're blue in the face. It is, after all, a hypothetical. What I'm curious about is whether you think that, given that his dislike for Dan was the only unequal factor, Bob is still morally culpable for having made the decision based on that?
Thank ye.