blindsage
Master of Arts
That is only because you are p'tahk!Stovocore
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is only because you are p'tahk!Stovocore
So youĀre only good because of the fear of retribution????
IĀm good, simply because itĀs the right thing to do.
Those who advance this argument specifically admit to being sociopaths.
Something to think about.
Reading comprehension seems to be a dying skill.
"And sometimes I wish that I could believe there is no God. Then I could embrace doing whatever I want without thought of consequence in an afterlife."
Reading comprehension seems to be a dying skill.
There is currently no term for a person who understands the rules of society, understands that they are free to obey them or not, and chooses intentionally to obey them through enlightened self-interest; some call them objectivists.
Those who advance this argument specifically admit to being sociopaths.
Something to think about.
A sociopath understand the rules of society and chooses to disregard them.
Most of them though have no interpersonal loyalty or real sense of ethics, and will screw another person over in a heartbeat if it gets them something out of it and the possibility of punishment or retribution is low. About 1% of the population are estimated to be sociopaths.
So because you wrote "could" instead of "would", we have all wildly misconstrued you somehow? Come now. I "could" never embrace murder and wanton harm to others as an example, whether God or society were to punish me for it.
You also put no qualifiers in your post, so how are we to know you meant skipping church on Sundays and working on the Sabbath instead of murder and rape?
We can't comprehend what you don't write, especially when you make blanket statements.
No, some still call them "sociopaths." At least the way I understand the way you phrased it.
Nope, I'm correct, I stand by what i said. Anything else is semantics, but whatever.
I'm speaking and reading goodish english....
FSM help my students if I don't!!
It's a valid point. However, we define people by the way they manifest themselves.
In fact at this point I am considering filing a complaint with the moderators.
Seems that at some point I must have offended you and you have been looking for an opportunity to exploit.
Am I going to have to do a search on these board to find where I have offended you, Ken? Or will you just tell me?
This discussion does underlie my problem though with the argument that the religious are more moral than the non-religious because they fear God's punishment. Like the person who refrains from murder because they fear going to jail, that lack of action does not come from a place of morality. True morality is uncoerced.
As an atheist, I don't think you can actually blaspheme, and you certainly can't be guilty of heresy.
I agree with the second statement, but I am not convinced that all religious people follow religious laws because they fear their Creator's retribution.
No they don't, and I didn't mean to make this implication. Some people clearly do the right thing because they are moved to, either by God's love or their own empathy.
Some people though explicitly DO make the argument that without God's punishment, they could do whatever they wanted to do. It is those people I wonder about.
Are you atheists really THAT sure there ISN'T a creator?