Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The gas station video is one that I often use to explain the difference between self-defense and sports fighting. In sports fighting the object is to win. The purpose of self-defense is to control a situation or manipulate the environment in a way that ensures safety. If you are fighting then it means all other methods of self-defense has failed. It's difficult for many people to understand this.I am not involved in TFT. I did find this video interesting.
The gas station video is one that I often use to explain the difference between self-defense and sports fighting. In sports fighting the object is to win. The purpose of self-defense is to control a situation or manipulate the environment in a way that ensures safety. If you are fighting then it means all other methods of self-defense has failed. It's difficult for many people to understand this.
Examples of not ensuring your safety.
Now for those doing the same thing and becoming the victim. How are your sports fighting skills going to help in this situation?
Yeah this is what happens when self defence instructors dont really understand how fights work.
And so they think that loosing to multiple guys and a weapon is the fault of some sort of training issue. Rather than a multiple guys with a weapon issue.
What people tend to overlook is the overlap. A punch in the face that will land in the ring vs a trained fighter will also probably land on untrained Joe six-pack in the bar.
If someone tries to steal my phone I will knee him in the groin, then hit him at the base of the neck and then stomp him on the ground. I practice that a lot and I'm pretty sure it will work.
The whole episode ignores many basic self-defense principles.
It ended with multiple guys with a weapon, but there's more to it. These are things any self-defense instructor will tell you, expect their friends to show up, expect that they may be armed, talk, de-escalate, disengage. Only fight if you have to, and if you do win quickly then remove yourself from the situation.
They were arrogant. They started an unnecessary fight. Instead of looking to de-escalate or disengage, they got into their opponents faces, took the fight outside and continued to fight multiple opponents.
I'm not saying ring-fighters can't transfer their skills into practical situations, but in this case they did very poorly.
If someone tries to steal my phone I will knee him in the groin, then hit him at the base of the neck and then stomp him on the ground. I practice that a lot and I'm pretty sure it will work.
There is a huge overlap. Many of the skills (depending upon the type of competition) are applicable. If it's a full-contact sport (including most grappling), then application should translate. For my definition of self-defense, there's a ton of overlap (the biggest disparity is really just stuff that isn't allowed in competition or would get you in trouble on the street). There's a difference in approach, as there's a range of attacks that are unlikely in a competition, and those attacks open up some other responses that aren't very useful for competition.What people tend to overlook is the overlap. A punch in the face that will land in the ring vs a trained fighter will also probably land on untrained Joe six-pack in the bar.
There is a huge overlap. Many of the skills (depending upon the type of competition) are applicable. If it's a full-contact sport (including most grappling), then application should translate. For my definition of self-defense, there's a ton of overlap (the biggest disparity is really just stuff that isn't allowed in competition or would get you in trouble on the street). There's a difference in approach, as there's a range of attacks that are unlikely in a competition, and those attacks open up some other responses that aren't very useful for competition.
Now, if we step out to the wider definition of self-defense that JGW is using (what I refer to as self-protection), most of that isn't all that relevant to competition. If someone trains specifically and solely for competition, there'd be none of that in their training.
Here's my view: it is possible to train for competition with the intent of self-defense. Training solely for competition (depending upon the type of competition) can provide good skills for the physical self-defense, and those can even be tweaked by training to serve better outside the competition.
Yeah this is what happens when self defence instructors dont really understand how fights work.
And so they think that loosing to multiple guys and a weapon is the fault of some sort of training issue. Rather than a multiple guys with a weapon issue.
Yeah I'm not a fan of him. Not one bit. Not the best of attitudes.Yeah if your aim is self defence. Competition is a training tool.
Otherwise real life happens everywhere. You need the tools to deal with that regardless what system you train.
That and there really is no way to prepare yourself mentally for someone swinging a 2x4 at your head full force.
I highly doubt someone who is not used to the adrenaline dump and fight or flight aspect of a trained fighter trying to swing punches and kicks at you full force would do better when the stakes go up even higher to weapons.
That said, it also completely misses the point that the difference is in training methods, not rules.
If scenario based training alone was more effective for teaching people to fight, fighters would spend all their time on scenario based training for in the ring scenarios... Which is partially true. I would bet every top level fighter drills specific scenarios. But those all get integrated back into sparring and live drills.
Get appropriate safety gear and training weapons and use the same methods combat athletes do and you'll get pretty good at dealing with weapons. Of course someone coming at you with a real weapon is going to be very different, and multiple people with weapons means you are at a very, very severe disadvantage.
Scenarios should be set up not to be won (beyond the beginner stage - they don't need help failing at that point). They should get progressively harder to win as the person's skill improves. Only movement drills and forms should be entirely winnable (you don't get a chance to fail at just "shrimping"). That's a flaw with how some places approach scenario training for self-defense. They don't progress the attacks much beyond beginner level. I've done "baseball bat" drills against those soft foam swords and against hard foam bats. I'm definitely not 100%, and if I find myself winning too often, I know someone's letting me win. But I have seen SD schools where it's really possible to "win" weapon defenses 99% of the time with a single response.I tried it back in the day with a nerf bat and a friend who had no training whatever. And I ate a lot of nerf.
Again real time speed and timing makes weapons defence ridiculously hard.
Our scenarios for guys training to fight are not designed to be won. So we do it in sparring. And a person will call out a position and you have to stop and reset from that position. But then it is sparring again. If you don't get out. Tough.
I have done multiple opponent sparring in MMA. But I just got bashed. There was no trick to it.