Sorry, just went back to re-read... most of this thread is just, well... silly, if I'm to be honest.... on a few fronts... but thought I might address this in a bit more detail.
I can only speak for myself & the knowledge I've gained over the years of training Martial Arts.
Hi Tarrycat, good to meet you.
Would you mind listing what the years of training you have are? You mentioned in your introduction thread a year and a half of ninjutsu training... and, if I'm correct in my supposition of your photos for "Bojutsu", you appear quite young... would that be correct? Please note this is not an attack, just trying to get a gauge on where you're coming from in this regard.
Someone here said that in boxing, Krav Maga, etc; there aren't that much techniques for you to learn, which I agree with.
Hmm... Boxing is certainly a fair bit more restricted in that there are (essentially) four punches, done with each hand (to make 8), with a few specialist punches, and an array of covering, jamming, and evasive movements... but it is referred to as the "sweet science" for very good reason. Krav can be taught a number of ways, and can be more or less complex (depending on the lineage)... but there can be quite an array of technical methods taught there.
I have boxed, I have observed attentively the techniques of Krav Maga & what all these sports or fighting techniques have in common is this: lack of variety in different fields of energy.
What I mean by that, is all of those techniques mostly require force & strength. They are explosive; which doesn't really require the same skills as Martial Arts does.
Personally, I don't see either as being focused on force and strength... boxing in particular can be quite technical... and subtle. Krav is based largely on overwhelming an aggressive force, but again doesn't necessarily rely on needing to overpower them... so I don't think I'd agree with that at all. Especially not with the idea that they don't require the same skills as martial arts (whatever skills you feel "martial arts" require... as "martial arts" is such a broad category, I don't think there can be any single set of skills required there at all... part of my problem with Kung Fu Wang's posts, for the record).
I have found that it is MUCH easier for me to revert to an explosive technique built upon strength, than to transform all of my energy into kata that requires me to move like the wind, the earth, fire, & water.
Okay... this may be the language of your dojo, but it is far from universal... even the few dojo who do follow Hayes' don't express in terms of "transform all of my energy"...
Most Martial Arts kata requires you to move based on the different elements (mentioned above).
Er... no. No, they don't.
And, as I asked for your background, I'll give mine. My training goes back a bit over 30 years, and includes Tani-ha Shito Ryu Shukokai Karate-do and Rhee Tae-kwon Do when I was younger, the last quarter of a century with Ninjutsu (my organisation was the first authentic school in Australia, dating from 1981, these days we are independent). I also train in two Koryu arts (Classical Japanese systems), Hyoho Niten Ichi Ryu Kenjutsu and Tenshinsho Den Katori Shinto Ryu. Along the way, I have trained in Seitei Jodo, Muso Shinden Ryu Iaido, Gracie BJJ, boxing, and have cross-trained in Aikido (Aiki-Kai and Iwama/Takemusu), Wing Chun, Hontai Yoshin Ryu, Judo, Krav Maga, RBSD systems (a number of systems, including Deane Lawlers R-Sult, Richard Dmitri's Senshido, and more), and have spent much of the last 3 decades plus researching and learning as much as I can about martial arts from around the world, focused particularly on Japanese arts, giving me insight into a fair bit more than the list here. That's the background I bring to this discussion.
It requires you to shift ALL of your energy into a specific element; & actually perfecting a technique like that is what takes so much time. Why? Because we don't live in those different states of energy on a daily basis. From the day you were born, you've only grown accustomed to ONE state of energy, & to now transform that energy you've lived with your entire life into other states of energy; THAT is where the struggle, the time, & the effort comes into play.
So, as said above, my background is very much the arts you're training in now... and none of this matches the way they are taught.
If I had to compare myself to my Sensei, there would be NO comparison. He can tranform his void energy into any other element, & one would not notice the shift in his energy, only in his kata. Why? Because he's been doing it for YEARS. THIS is where the "mastery" concept comes into play.
I'm glad you think highly of him, but again, this is not the way any of this is taught or described.
Martial Arts is all about energy, & connecting to your higher self. It's about the vibration of the atoms in your body & tuning into those vibrations.
This is similar to what Hayes was saying years ago, although somewhat muddled up.
This is why beginners will practice kata in steps, rather than in a flowing motion. Or they will do the kata, & then pause, disrupting the energy they started with - they are not used to it. They continue to shut the element's energy off, & revert back to the energy they're used to.
Er... no... the reason beginners practice the kata in steps is because they don't have the skills yet... nothing to do with the "energies shifting" or similar...
I don't know if all Martial Arts divisions requires you to shift into the different elements, but Ninjutsu does.
No, it doesn't.
It's the only way I can put it into words for you.
Okay.
Yeah, don't take this the wrong way, but that entire thing is garbage. Basically, he's taken Hayes' early books (including all the mistakes), and repeated them... in some cases confounding them with others, and having no idea just how bad what he's putting across is.
Five elements (Japanese philosophy) - Wikipedia
The idea of the Godai in Japanese culture isn't in question (for the record, that's not really the way that they're used in the Gorin no Sho, but that's another discussion...), the question is the application of them to the "energies in kata"... which is not a common application, nor an accurate one. And this article has no reference to it, nor relevance.
Ah, the Kashiwa guys... haven't seen them for a bit... they do tend to cater to the fantasies more than the way things are taught in Japan, and have been called out on that a number of times. Incidentally, they actually teach not too far from Don Roley... who is one of the better sources on this idea, having lived in Japan for 15 years, training with Hatsumi sensei, and mostly as a personal student of the late Oguri sensei.
Speaking of....
Rantings and Ravings
It's actually a very well-known concept the Japanese use & apply to their techniques.
No, they don't. Believe me... they don't. If you go to Japan and ask whether, say, Koku is a "fire" technique, or a "water" one, you'll just get a puzzled look and a polite smile...
We use it in all of our kata.
Okay, but that's your dojo. It is not the norm, nor is it something "in all martial art kata".
Some kata require you to be more stabilised, & rooted (earth), while others require you to move around freely (wind - like Aikido).
I am familiar with each and every kata of each and every school of the Bujinkan that is commonly taught, and no, that is simply incorrect.