Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is pretty much rooting in Tai Chi, but at least one of the family styles (I believe it is Wu) does go up and down and is still rooted, but it does still look very different from the LHBF rooting.
Was the main difference just the foot turning, or is there more? I also realise that my back leg straightens a lot, which is technically incorrect as far as LHBF is concerned which makes it look as if it goes "too high".
Yes, it's supposed to be a server directory. There's only LHBF related stuff in there, so don't worry about finding anything "else".
You should see three folders. One of them is completely dedicated to Choi Wai Lun's videos. Another is a collection of LHBF snippets from around the web. The owner decided to, to put it lightly, "rename" many videos to show what he think's of the LHBF in the videos or alternately a "description" of the person. Mine was renamed to "sloppylbhf" and unfortunately is the only video of a complete main form anywhere on the web.
There's also the "Five Character Secrets" or "Five Word Song" of LHBF in Chinese and english, but the english translation is very very poor. I've been trying to get it translated, with one aborted attempt.
Drake Sansone (the owner of the archive) appears to be one of Choi Wai Lun's former students. He's very zealous. You may have read his posts in many other forums relating to what he thinks of anyone who didn't learn from Choi Wai Lun himself. He also goes by the nick of "Swmng Dragon" or something similar. He has a few posts at EmptyFlower as well. He hasn't appeared to be very active for a long while now.
Right now, I'm watching England vs Australia in the Ashes. I'm guessing it's the same for baseball.
That is, the front foot lands JUST before the bat is swung. That gives a lot of power for little energy and a lot more power than standing in one stance and swinging the arms.
In baseball, the pitcher's front foot lands JUST before the ball is thrown.
That is the philosophy of LHBF.
I cannot say for sure that it is better than Taiji. But it fits in well with LHBF of "start together stop together".
sorry to bring cricket into it again, but i guess it depends on which way you are swinging (so to speak)... pretty much all batsmen will have some backswing *as* they are stepping, unless they are playing backfoot defence, where the lift needed is minimal, or they are master punchers of the ball like Ricky Ponting I mean, the backlift will also contribute to the total kinetic energy imparted to the ball, no? And players do stand and deliver as well, the reason for stepping is to get your body into the hitting zone, depending on where the ball is bowled.
Sorry about putting my 2 cents in if this is completely off topic now.
And that is not incompatible with Liu He Ba Fa either. Liu He Ba Fa contains a very logical mix of both kinds of footwork. Sometimes, both kinds of footwork are present in the same movement. That is what that "foot turning" thing a few hundred or so posts ago is about. When we practice, we turn our back foot on the toe (but the whole foot is still in contact with the ground). When it's actually used, it is up to the situation for the person to move in what way is required. In close quarters, where it is not always possible to step forward and deliver, it is still possible to turn the back foot (either going from a bow/arrow stance or a 4/6 stance). By doing that, you can still generate good power while at the same time just standing and delivering. Even then, there's no requirement in Liu He Ba Fa that foot turning or stepping must be present when applying an action for real.
There is simply no universal principle that favours either kind of footwork absolutely. You see people like Andrew Strauss who has been dismissed during the Ashes both for having no foot movement (against the quicks) and sometimes too much foot movement (against Shane Warne). It's not really an issue about different types of footwork. It becomes an issue about being able to make the right choice without hesitation in less than a second. Liu He Ba Fa has the best of both worlds, but you would also get the same from doing both Taiji and Xingyi. In my experience learning and teaching Liu He Ba Fa, a lot of effort is used in explaining, for a certain action, what situations require foot movement, which don't and which is better served by the hybrid.
Interesting. I did read some of the posts on this topic earlier but i'm not sure that i know enough about Xing Yi (and i *know* that i don't know enough about Liu he ba fa!) to really grasp the nuances of it all. But the twisting on the back foot you describe sounds a little like what i've always called "screwing" the toes - whether to provide a stable launch pad for an explosive movement from the waist or as a side-effect of said explosive movement i've never been able to work out! It's feels like a more concentrated version of the foot movement in a classic boxing uppercut anyway. And all the Xing Yi stuff i've done has been hands and feet moving together, not as a sequence. But as i said, i haven't done that much.
Utterly agree about using real-world examples to find new ways to illustrate ideas in MA. Sometimes the ways in which unexpected comparisons don't work can be as thought-provoking as the ways in which they do.
Xingyi uses attack as defense where Taiji and I believe Liu He Ba Fa do not.
whether to provide a stable launch pad for an explosive movement from the waist or as a side-effect of said explosive movement i've never been able to work out! It's feels like a more concentrated version of the foot movement in a classic boxing uppercut anyway.
Depends on who you learn it from or what videos you watch.
I have been taught both ways.
Liu He Ba Fa is not as circular as Taiji is (tt shouldn't be; at least it shouldn't look circular due to it all being internalised). It even uses a lot of the Xingyi handwork where the arm is like a wedge that splits the opponent up while being able to launch a direct attack at the same time (with the same hand).
If someone decides to take the "full course", they should be learning the defence aspect and the attack aspect using the same postures such that there doesn't need to be a change in action, thus it becomes using attack as defence and vice versa.
Point taken and it may also depend on the style of Xingyi you are talking about, I do Hebei style but there are other styles to consider and I have seen Shanxi style but I do not believe I have ever seen Hunan style and I am told it is rather different. Also I recently saw a style (sorry the name escapes me) of Xingyi that actually used more of a front stance.