psi_radar said:
Forgive me Doc, I've got a college education but for the life of me I couldn't visualize this, it's pretty codified.
Yes I understand. The knowledge is so specific and drawn from such a wide variety of human body, and non-human body related sciences, it can be a bit disconcerting until someone actually physically teaches you its application.
Even then rather than trying to "understand" it, it's best to know when and how to use it, and understand it much later. Ed Parker always said, "learn how first, understand later." Unfortunately many want to understand everything now, and speak of concepts and principles they can't put into practical application. Ed Parker called that "Hypothetical Kenpo." "If you do this then I'll do this." they say. Except one thing, "They can't do this." because they spend all their time talking about it instead of doing it.
I have several M.D.'s as students. I also have a couple of Dr's of Chiopractic Medicine, a Dr. of Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine, and a licensed Acupuncturist in our main location. None of them understand what I do, they only know it works and subscribe to the methodology, so no big deal.
Youre kind of on the right track in one of its applications. Its complexity or simplicity is predicated on the knowledge of the individual. Unfortunately, some me toos (not you obviously) sit back, offer nothing, and chime in after others have had real dialog in an effort to increase their understanding. These "know-it-alls" would reduce everything they dont understand to a level of simplicity commensurate with their own meager knowledge level, rather than accept there may be really significant information they dont have a grasp of.
I believe Ed Parker Sr. called it Full Cup Syndrome. Some of these people have been discrediting information I've been desseminating for years only to resurface later to embrace the same information, with the qualifier, Ive been doing that for a long time. They should go back to beating the Neanderthal bag and let adults have their discussions.
At any rate, one use of Spatial Distortion examines how the human body determines its relationship with other objects in space through its senses and focuses primarily on the Visual Cortex Line of Sight, and its affect on base Startle Reflex Mechanisms. Its very nature precludes an individual from being capable of compensating, even with advance notice, and it does break down structural integrity creating momentary weakness and a lack of coordination.
A very simplistic example that is not combat related to help you understand:
Have you ever been focused on an object while moving, and been distracted enough to lose your place in space in anticipation of some physical action that requires a significant shift in weight, balance, and muscle use?
Like looking at a well-endowed woman while walking and anticipating stepping off of a curb only to prematurely miss. Now the ground didnt move, but you expected your foot to drop in height, so your body anticipated the change in height, adjusted your weight distribution in anticipation of the extra weight on one side of your body, and your arm swing moved to counter-balance the action.
When the drop off didnt occur, for a second you felt like an idiot. You were momentarily weak, uncoordinated, startled and confused. And although you recovered quickly, for that moment you were extremely vulnerable. A good understanding of how these mechanisms work will allow you to induce the same effect, subconsciously and totally destroy a persons structural integrity without their knowledge as they initiate an assault.
Thats the Spatial Distortion I was speaking of as I understand, use, and teach it to my students. Hope that helps a bit, and please excuse the insert rants not directed at you. Idiots get old, but continue to be idiots nevertheless.