I have to wonder, sometimes, when I see the negative comments, that it could be a result of, someone, for lack of better words, being jealous. Seems that sometimes people are afraid to admit that something may not really be what its cracked up to, so in turn, instead of admitting it, they bash someone who stepped up to the plate, and 'supercharged' the material.
I think you are correct, this is a large part of it. I started MA when I was 8. A lot of what I learned was not very good, in terms of "combat". It hurt when I came to this realization, because of the time and energy put into an endeavor that turned out to be something other than what I thought.
This of course depends on your goals. My goal was combat efficiency (more martial, than art). I have seen that look on the face of many BB's and 2nds, 3rds, 4ths etc when they come to our camp or into our school. I have seen it on the face of guys from various styles when they came into the Krav classes or the FMA classes I was atending.... and were met with a more realistic, devastating training method. We have had some high ranking Kenpo people come out, and I have seen that look on their face, I recognized it cuz I felt it too.
Some of them are more focused on getting better and they can quickly say "wow, good stuff, I wanna add to the good I have and get rid of the rest." Others can't and so they say "thats not new, that's not improved that doesn't work" etc... Too bad. I am concerned with "what is right" not "who is right".
As for the empty hand techniques....I agree with those as well. Nothing wrong with teaching the step thru, if you wanted to, if you thought it was realistic, but IMHO, I think that its best to focus on things that are going to be the most commonly seen.
Agreed, and we do work off of a rear step through once in a while. But, if you can respond and block/parry/check/trap/slip a good, fast jab/cross/kick, then I think it is safe to say you will be comfortable picking up the untrained fighters looping rear step through punch!
Reading Prof. Bishops book on Kajukenbo, this is exactly what they did with their techniques....put the focus more on a more realistic attack, jabs, crosses, etc.
I don't know Prof. Bishop (other than some of his posts here) nor have I had the chance to read his book, but I have spent some time in Kaju schools (one of my brothers is currently training at a Kaju school) and I appreciate their warrior spirit and realistic approach. Same with much of JKD, FMA and Krav. Those styles seem to have a higher concentration of guys working against resisting, realistic attacks and honing their material to real life altercations. So is the AKKI, but we also have Parkers motion built in, and that is the clincher for me.