Brother Peter, Master Chun did the form so fast I was lucky to pick up what little I did. The tiger postures, by the way, are the wide kneeling stances with both tiger claw hands in front, in other words it's not that 'Black Tiger Looking Back' posture that we practice, it's straight on. and the form also closes out with that done twice while moving back. There is no salutation and closing like we have, nothing at all like that. There appeared to be more opened hand striking to the throat and face in the rapid fire sequences. There were sweeps, forearm strikes & elbows. Again, there were also similarities and you could pick out some of the things we do in our version. I didn't notice the 'Hansuki fist' but then again I wasn't looking for it either. I am positive, however, that neither Seavey, Fritz or Villari taught it to us back then. I left in 1981 and never heard of it. This also goes for many black belts of that era I trained with. I'm sure Bill Mailman teaches the original like you stated but the question would be, from what time line or generation of black belts? In other words, I would have to say that this fist formation was added later on in the system and would explain why the older black belts never heard of it.
CoolKempoDude: I believe you wanted to know the meaning of the word Hansuki. It will be interesting to tell you that I was on the same quest for many years. I asked Professor Cerio, he was never told either and didn't know. Master John Fritz used to call it 7 Death Strikes of the Tiger, however, the only one who came up with an answer for me was Brother Peter Teymourez, so in all due respect he should answer that one for you!
Back to that fellow 1960. Yes, I have read some of his posts and found them to be very interesting. However, my question would be this. Hansuki, since it was given to Cerio and since that was in the mid-to late 60's (around the time of its inception or close to it, I believe) seems to have laways been this 'chosen' or secretive form. So, why would either Chow or Chun ever give permission for someone to film it, never mind even perform the whole thing in front of an outsider? Know what I mean? Peter, see if you can find out more from '1960', I'm curious. Respectfully submitted.