Thunderbolt
Orange Belt
Sami,Kenpohermit said:EPAK= ED PARKER'S AMERICAN KENPO
The question in the other post asked if Professor Chow was in the lineage of American Kenpo, those that said no explained that while Prof. Chow is an important part of American Kenpo's history because he taught and inspired Mr. Parker, American Kenpo's lineage starts with the founder Mr. Parker, the ironic thing is that the very people who feel this is an insult to Prof. Chow for not including him in the lineage of American Kenpo also talk negitively about American Kenpo as a system, so you would think that if they dont like American Kenpo why do they want to connect Prof. Chow to it?
In any case if people dont know what a lineage is in the traditional sense of how it is used in martial arts they might have voted yes thinking it means included in the history. Another Ironic thing is the people who say Chow is the start of the lineage or Mitose still call the system EPAK which means "Ed Parker's" American Kenpo versus just saying Prof. Chow's American Kenpo or Mitose's American Kenpo which of course would be wrong in reality Mitose and Chow both taught different systems not American Kenpo) but that seems to escape these people who are bent on discrediting the founder of our system.
Respectfully
Sami
Have 3 things to say.
1-Nobody was born and automatically become a good martial artist. You must learn it from somebody.
2-The fact that Ed Parker acknowledges there is 10% of what Chow taught in AK.????? Chow should have some kind of "credit" or "acknowledgement" in AK.
3-don't worry about Chow being in EPK's lineage. From what I heard, Chow didn't like Ed Parker for some reasons ANYWAY. Even though all of AK people want Chow to be included in EP's lineage, I'm sure Chow will say "HELL NO" from heaven.
have a good day