Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nothing, but that wasn't my point. Some counters that use the hips to shift the opponent aren't useful when the opponent doesn't put weight on. There are side control methods I can use that don't put much of my weight on the opponent, to take that tool away.
There is a trick in mount where you squeeze your knees together and sit a bit off the guy to prevent a sweep.I'm talking about things like a basic upa. That uses the hips/legs to shift them, which wouldn't be useful if their weight isn't on them. I'm not arguing this makes it harder to escape/counter, but that it's a very different thing to escape/counter. In many ways, it's easier, but you do need a different approach.
Hehe yeah to me I could definitely see the Pinans as being derived from Kanku, so many times I've watched someone mid-way Kanku thinking "Ah cool they're doing Pinan 2/4/5" but alas it wasn't!I’ve been told Heian is just the Japanese pronunciation of Pinan. Same kanji, same meaning. Many of the Japanese schools went back to calling them Pinan instead of Heian.
Your Bushi Matsumura stuff jogged my memory a bit. I think the Okinawan teacher I talked about only teaches Pinan 5 because that’s the only intact way Matsumura allegedly taught it (or the closest possible), whereas the claim is Itosu (and possibly Funakoshi, depending on who you ask) changed the Pinan series quite a bit.
Some claim the Pinan series is Itosu’s creation, breaking down Kusanku/Kanku into easier bits for children and beginners. Others claim it was I believe Matsumura’s and is based on another prominent kata* and a bit of Kanku.
At the end of the day, it’s all trivial knowledge to me Interesting, but trivial; I need to know what I’ve been taught.
*I can’t for the life of me remember which kata it was claimed. I want to say Gojushiho, but I’m pretty sure it’s not. It’s a prominent kata that’s not done in either organization I’ve been in. I’ve seen it many times, and after watching for the Pinan kata, it looked far closer to the Pinans than Kanku does. It’s done in Shotokan, and I remember watching a Kanazawa video of it when I was watching for Pinan stuff in it. Really driving me crazy now
Haha all good, appreciate the segway back . It is funny how a very non-grappling thread turned into one!So, to prevent the millionth grappling thread...@_Simon_, do you have any plans to continue going to the TSD place? Or going to keep on looking?
Edit: hmm it's not letting me tag @_Simon_ up there, but letting me here...weird.
I’m assuming Kyokushin Kanku? Sosai heavily modified that kata, and it looks far more Pinan than any other version of Kanku. I really like the Kyokushin Kanku, but saying there’s a lot of parallels based on that version isn’t really accurate in the whole grand scheme of Kanku.Hehe yeah to me I could definitely see the Pinans as being derived from Kanku, so many times I've watched someone mid-way Kanku thinking "Ah cool they're doing Pinan 2/4/5" but alas it wasn't!
I’m assuming Kyokushin Kanku? Sosai heavily modified that kata, and it looks far more Pinan than any other version of Kanku. I really like the Kyokushin Kanku, but saying there’s a lot of parallels based on that version isn’t really accurate in the whole grand scheme of Kanku.
It’s like Useishi. Sosai heavily modified Gojushiho, and because of the heavy modification renamed it Useishi. Useishi somehow also means Gojushiho - 54 Steps. I think it’s an older way of saying it. Gotta love languages I don’t understand
You mean YOUR right way don't you?It isn't about one art being better than the other. It's about doing things the right way and the wrong way. If your goal is to escape the ground as quickly as possible, doing things the wrong way isn't going to help you achieve that goal.
Sorry, I meant Sushiho, not Useishi. My mistake. No idea how I mixed up the names. I think Useishi is the Okinawan pronunciation of Gojushiho?Yeah Kyokushin Kanku but I was mainly referring to other versions of Kanku that have alot of elements/sequences of Pinan katas. But it's been awhile since I've watched it, I may be mixing them up. XD
I don't think I've seen Useishi, just looked in the syllabus, there's Sushiho for 3rd Dan in there but unsure if that's the same as Gojushiho/Useishi.
Ah just Wiki'd Gojushiho, yep other names include Useishi and Sushiho. Ah and also says: "Gojushiho was developed by one of the Okinawan karate master, "Sokon Matsumura" and named it as "Uesheishi" under the fluency of chinese Kungfu." Fascinating..
Ah thanks for posting!@_Simon_
See any similarities between the Pinan series and Gankaku kata (aka Chinto before Funakoshi renamed it)?
Edit: Then again, Kanku Dai
I think Pinan had to have come from both, not one or the other. Too many similarities IMO.
You mean YOUR right way don't you?
Every art has merit. Every art has things it does better, and worse, that others. You are seriously kidding yourself with this idea that BJJ does everything right. I am certain your MA sample is very, very small. It is proven by your ideas.
A good BJJ blue belt can deliver some quality ground work instruction for the very basics, in my experience. Not all of them, but those who have skill (learned or natural) at teaching can.or wait until you're at least a purple belt to start teaching it to your students
I have no doubt a blue belt in BJJ knows some ground work. That is not the point that you just keep missing. While you are very passionate about your BJJ and I can appreciate that, most everything you are arguing in proposition for can be argued in Hapkido, and all other styles. For example, you have railed on the validity of the origins of Hapkido. A quick internet search stirs up the same findings regarding BJJ in origin and who it has taken some of its methods from. So please do us all a favor and chill out a little with your very tilted opinion. Two sides of the coin and all. You can be passionate about your art without coming off sounding just, stupid.No, the right way period. You're either doing it right, or you're doing it wrong. I've already thoroughly broken down why those Hapkido schools were doing their ground fighting wrong. If you find issue with my breakdowns, by all means tell me how I'm wrong.
Every art has merit, that is true. However the discussion here was about quality control, and the fact that the lack of competition or standards caused questionable stuff to pop up within the sphere of Hapkido. So much so, that some of these schools are comfortable enough to post their craziness online for the world to see. Here's another such example;
I have no issue with Hapkido schools adopting BJJ to their curriculums, but if you're going to do it, please either hire a Bjj instructor, or wait until you're at least a purple belt to start teaching it to your students. Also be up front and HONEST about where you're pulling these techniques from.
I have no doubt a blue belt in BJJ knows some ground work. That is not the point that you just keep missing.
While you are very passionate about your BJJ and I can appreciate that, most everything you are arguing in proposition for can be argued in Hapkido, and all other style. For example, you have railed on the validity of the origins of Hapkido. A quick internet search stirs up the same findings regarding BJJ in origin and who it has taken some of its methods from.
So please do us all a favor and chill out a little with your very tilted opinion. Two sides of the coin and all. You can be passionate about your art without coming off sounding just, stupid.
I’ve been told Heian is just the Japanese pronunciation of Pinan. Same kanji, same meaning. Many of the Japanese schools went back to calling them Pinan instead of Heian.
Your Bushi Matsumura stuff jogged my memory a bit. I think the Okinawan teacher I talked about only teaches Pinan 5 because that’s the only intact way Matsumura allegedly taught it (or the closest possible), whereas the claim is Itosu (and possibly Funakoshi, depending on who you ask) changed the Pinan series quite a bit.
Some claim the Pinan series is Itosu’s creation, breaking down Kusanku/Kanku into easier bits for children and beginners. Others claim it was I believe Matsumura’s and is based on another prominent kata* and a bit of Kanku.
At the end of the day, it’s all trivial knowledge to me Interesting, but trivial; I need to know what I’ve been taught.
*I can’t for the life of me remember which kata it was claimed. I want to say Gojushiho, but I’m pretty sure it’s not. It’s a prominent kata that’s not done in either organization I’ve been in. I’ve seen it many times, and after watching for the Pinan kata, it looked far closer to the Pinans than Kanku does. It’s done in Shotokan, and I remember watching a Kanazawa video of it when I was watching for Pinan stuff in it. Really driving me crazy now
They’ve got grizzlies in the land of Oz?Okeydokey, so yep as per my other Rolled ankle thread.... I'm out of action for a little while. At the tournament 11 weeks ago I rolled my ankle badly, and x-ray, ultrasound and ct scan showed partially torn ligament, fracture and bone fragment. Gonna have a cast put on and then recover, then physiotherapy down the track.
So no new style for the moment... was very emotional and bummed out by this but I'll just focus on what I can do. Which is jumping flying side kicks over 7 people breaking 4 stacked boards being held by a grizzly bear.
Thanks for tuning in! No idea how I can keep my cardio up during this time haha, there are only so many pushups I can muster. Will still do upper body weight training, hand techniques, and pistol squats galore with my good leg hehe!
Hehe nah we don't, was just thinking of one of the more dangerous activities I could be doing [emoji14]They’ve got grizzlies in the land of Oz?