Steve
Mostly Harmless
It's okay, guys. It's pretty well established that the Brits are funnier in theory than in practice.
Except for Monty Python. That's funny stuff.
Except for Monty Python. That's funny stuff.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nothing I have said was intended as as insult but now I know what insults you...............
it's Great Britain btw
No I wouldn't insult you, I don't intend to insult anyone in fact. It just that on the internet people find meanings where there are none and find insult where there is none intended. sometimes someones online personality grates on another which is what I think mine does to James K which is why he is intend on taking insult.
anyway I've just come in from my second class of JKD and have had a great time so I'm unupsettable at the moment lol!
At least I spelled the name of your country correctly.
Of course I don't believe in stereotyping, even though you are uncannily accurate if you imagine me to be a cross between a Monty Python character and James Bond, and I am chased around by large groups of scantily clad women like Benny Hill on a daily basis.
I was just poking fun, forgive me. It is something we do a lot in Britain.
I don't think it's any different in America. But if you try to get too chummy with someone who doesn't know you're joking, things go south fast.Elftengu is right you know, we do tend to be very polite with people we don't like and insult our mates. Not only insults but some of the most appalling practical jokes you can imagine, and nicknames, ah the nicknames!
.
1) JKD could now be said to be virtually 100% American
2) No one is seriously bashing anyone else, so just lighten up guys eh?
2) Agreed, but you are wrong about summarizing Americans.
I don't think it's any different in America. But if you try to get too chummy with someone who doesn't know you're joking, things go south fast.
For what it's worth, I'm ready and willing to get into a detailed discussion of everything wrong with Britain. That sounds fun and there's certainly plenty to talk about!
Let's discuss both the similarities and differences between Jeet Kune Do and Mixed Martial Arts.
In 2004, UFC President Dana White was quoted as saying that Bruce Lee is the "father of mixed martial arts."
From this we can make the assumption that Modern MMA was heavily influenced by one of the principle concepts of JKD, which is to "take what is effective and throw away what is ineffective".
However, while the first few UFC tournaments were "no-holds barred", more recent rules have limited contestants in order to prevent death or serious injury from occuring; MMA has taken the shape of a bona fide sport, which in many ways contradicts JKD's philosophies against limitations.
Also, a lot of people tend to think of the two as being the same thing, and use them pretty much interchangeably.
Thoughts? Comments? Opinions?
Xael, you've seen every single MMA fighter in the world then to be able to announce that MMA fighters stand up is poor? Most of these men and women in MMA are actually masters in their own right, most I know have Dan grades in a TMA, you can't judge the thousands of MMA fighters there are by a few you have seen. Btw that includes Americans like Chuck Lidell as well as Europeans and Asians. The myth that people wander into an MMA gym and after 6 months come out as fighters is just that, a myth. Most fighters I know and know of have spent years training.
Again though the idea that MMA people can't translate their skills into SD is being touted, this is incorrect, we can fight no rules just the same as anyone. We can do eye gouges as good as the next person, if that's what is called for. We don't have to stop doing a techniques just because usually in the cage the ref will stop it if it becomes too much, we can carry it through when needed, we can adapt techniques for the 'street' as well as anyone else can.
Please do your research before rubbishing MMA, actually look at what people train before repeating the insulting statement that MMA fighters are jacks of all trades. It's not true and it is insulting.
I do not need to see every single MMA fighter in the world. I have seen hundreds and that's a pretty good number. Do I need to see every drunk driver to make the judgment call that driving drunk is stupid? Use common sense here.
Most of these MMA fighters are not masters. That is a joke. I love what King Mo said regarding MMA fighters. He is a perfect example of what I am talking about. Most of MMA is purely marketing, for example take the way people build up fighters. They say, "Anderson Silva is a world class boxer/kickboxer.." and here is the problem that King Mo points out. When did Anderson ever compete in world class boxing/kickboxing? He did not. So stop saying he is something that he isnt. Furthermore it is not saying that he does not have the skills, I for one think he would do well in kickboxing, but calling him world class when he has never even competed like that is a falsehood. Most people that follow and watch MMA are caught up on the hype train that feeds you info regarding these fighters.
There are quite a few masters of Judo and BJJ out there, even wrestling. I have nothing but respect for them, but I am talking about standup.
TMA = ? SD =? Sorry do not know what that is.
You accuse me of not doing research, re-read what I wrote in page 4 of this thread before making these claims. I can tell my comments about striking and proper punching techniques went over your head. You really have no idea what you are talking about here. I am sorry you are insulted but because you get a blackbelt in an art that mass produces black belts like they are going out of style does not mean squat. Having a blackbelt in a korean art like TKD/TSD or regular karate hardly makes you a striker.
Elftengu is right you know, we do tend to be very polite with people we don't like and insult our mates. Not only insults but some of the most appalling practical jokes you can imagine, and nicknames, ah the nicknames!
Not much different here based on my experience... except for the practical joke bits, those I don't do.
Having a blackbelt in a korean art like TKD/TSD or regular karate hardly makes you a striker.
What sort of striking experience do you think would qualify someone as a, let's say, competent striker? Let's not even get into "world class." Are you a competent striker?I do not need to see every single MMA fighter in the world. I have seen hundreds and that's a pretty good number. Do I need to see every drunk driver to make the judgment call that driving drunk is stupid? Use common sense here.
Most of these MMA fighters are not masters. That is a joke. I love what King Mo said regarding MMA fighters. He is a perfect example of what I am talking about. Most of MMA is purely marketing, for example take the way people build up fighters. They say, "Anderson Silva is a world class boxer/kickboxer.." and here is the problem that King Mo points out. When did Anderson ever compete in world class boxing/kickboxing? He did not. So stop saying he is something that he isnt. Furthermore it is not saying that he does not have the skills, I for one think he would do well in kickboxing, but calling him world class when he has never even competed like that is a falsehood. Most people that follow and watch MMA are caught up on the hype train that feeds you info regarding these fighters.
There are quite a few masters of Judo and BJJ out there, even wrestling. I have nothing but respect for them, but I am talking about standup.
TMA = ? SD =? Sorry do not know what that is.
You accuse me of not doing research, re-read what I wrote in page 4 of this thread before making these claims. I can tell my comments about striking and proper punching techniques went over your head. You really have no idea what you are talking about here. I am sorry you are insulted but because you get a blackbelt in an art that mass produces black belts like they are going out of style does not mean squat. Having a blackbelt in a korean art like TKD/TSD or regular karate hardly makes you a striker.
I have no doubt that traditional martial arts (TMA) can beat MMA, as long as some simple criteria are in place, as follows:
1. The TMA practitioner would have to spend the same amount of time and effort on their 'martial' training and also on their fitness and stamina training as the MMAist.
2. The TMA practitioner would have to have a training methodology that included frequent pressure training against other fighting styles including all arts that are popularly incorporated into MMA, e.g. Muay Thai, BJJ, Greco Roman, Boxing etc.
3. Any such pressure training would have to be against someone who is a currently active and accomplished MMAist themselves, to 'keep it real'.
4. The TMA practitioner must know from actual experience what it is like to be punched repeatedly about the head and body, and kicked, slammed and mounted by a strong person without losing their head or will to fight.
5. To enable the TMA practitioner to obey rule No.1 of self defence and to run away from the encounter if at all possible, the TMA practitioner must be able to outrun most MMAists over a straight mile, including parkour-esque negotiation of obstacles.
The question is, how many of you or the people you train with, satisfy these criteria? Not many I bet.
If I'm getting ElfTengu's post, I think he's suggesting that there are some but not many. Taking it a step further, it looks like James Saville trains at least some BJJ, too. Won a couple of fights by submission.I have just the MMA fighter for this challenge, he's called James Saville, has a TKD black belt and is one of the best MMA fighters I know, he's quite young still not 20 yet but is also amazing at parkour. Have a look on You Tube for him.