CoryKS
Senior Master
Well, yeah...it's the Jehovah thing all over again....
*throws stone*
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, yeah...it's the Jehovah thing all over again....
Jeff, I try to tell people about how racist the orient is, and how America is about the least racist country going.....it shocks them every time
i heard the tail thing too when i was stationed there
like the word for "foriegner" also meaning "barbarian"
and the japanese are not the worst, the koreans hate the japanese, the japanese hate the chinese, the chinese look down thier noses at EVERYONE< and they ALL hate the philipinos....
Yeah but otoh the kanji for woman is also used as a radical for the kanji for 'slave'.
So sometimes it makes sense...
<runs for his life>
One of my old bosses taught me characters this way:
Take the charater for tree (ki) and write three of them together in the same space. Then it becomes forest (mori). Take the charater for woman (onna) and write three of them togeter in the same space and it becomes noisy or troublesome (yakamashii). :ladysman:
Two examples, both misidentified as proud of being white...
St Patrick's day is "IRISH pride", not white
Likewise, "Italian pride" is focused not on race, but, national origin. That is exactly it, and the co-opting of the term has been lovingly embraced by the media.
If I were her, I would have said "Then you are not African as far as I'm concerned. You're not African-Americans, you are simply Americans." How anyone can not consider native Africans as black is beyond me. It's silly!!But also understand this, as well. "Black" people do not include non-slave Africans in that mix, generally speaking. They are African. It reminds me of my buddy's sister-in-law, who is Eritrian. She could not understand, having immigrated legally to the U.S., how she was not accepted as "Black" by so-called African-Americans. Her comment was, "but we are the same". I had to tell her, as had others, that historically and culturally speaking, we were not the same..
I know I'm coming late with this, but...
The difference is fairly clear. If you tell me what "nation" in Africa that my family came from, then I will celebrate it, rather then a celebration of being Black. But if you can't do that, then I will claim "Black pride" because I KNOW I can at least trace my family back to the slavery period in the U.S., and every thing subsequent to that I can claim as sharing a cultural familiarity.
You see, slavery destroyed the culture of the individual slave, if only by nature of the fact that the 1st generation slave could not necessarily teach that culture to his children. Therefore they became "Black" culturally, and all that entails, rather then African.
But the "Irish" or "Italian" has no such handicap. There is no need for them to claim "white pride" as a generic culture, becuase they can trace it back to a specific European heritage. Blacks can't.
But also understand this, as well. "Black" people do not include non-slave Africans in that mix, generally speaking. They are African. It reminds me of my buddy's sister-in-law, who is Eritrian. She could not understand, having immigrated legally to the U.S., how she was not accepted as "Black" by so-called African-Americans. Her comment was, "but we are the same". I had to tell her, as had others, that historically and culturally speaking, we were not the same. She did not have the history of slavery and American racism that Black in America share. Although we may share some common ancestry, it is somewhat irrelevant when you talk about the destruction of the slaves original cultural understanding and heritage.
If I were her, I would have said "Then you are not African as far as I'm concerned. You're not African-Americans, you are simply Americans."
How anyone can not consider native Africans as black is beyond me. It's silly!!
Yep!!And I would have replied, "You're right, that's why I don't claim to be African-American, but Black. Or mostly, just American."
Yep!!
I wouldn't disagree with this sentiment either. Not only do I agrwee with this in a biological sense but in a religious snse also. If the majority consider the US to be a nation founded on Judeo-Christian values, then it has to be accepted that Abraham was Ethiopean and Moses was Egyptian.If not, then we are all Africans...
I wouldn't disagree with this sentiment either. Not only do I agrwee with this in a biological sense but in a religious snse also. If the majority consider the US to be a nation founded on Judeo-Christian values, then it has to be accepted that Abraham was Ethiopean and Moses was Egyptian.
I would much rather have the designation pink-American or Multi couloured-American based on my actual skin tone, but that's just me. :rofl:
I stand corrected!!Abraham was from Ur, which is in present day Iraq, Moses was a Hebrew born in Egypt.
Well I guess we`ll have to agree to disagree. From what you`re saying the definition seems so broad that pretty much anything short of the weather could be institutional racism if it could inconvenience some member of a minority population. But I appreciate you taking the time to explain it. You`ve given me something to think about.
I guess the problem is so big I can`t see it. I`ll just have to continue to rely on being nice to people until they give me a reason not to.
wow, gee, lets just get all the evil white folks to kill themselves......
[/list]
horse crap.
schools are funded through property taxes, taxes are based off of property VALUES.
why do you suppose the property value of houses in high minority areas is in the toilet?
could it be the rampant crime that seems to go with minorities every time?
how is it fair to take money from areas with higher property values to give to the lower value areas?
it isnt
minority areas want better schools? stop turning the nieghborhoods into war zones between dealers and guess what? the schools get more money through taxes.
That is based on an individuals actions. You have to show how this particular behavior is institutionalized. I work in law enforcement. I have to say that I have seen no institutional policies that allow for the unlawful treatment of Blacks or other minorities. In fact, I have seen quite the opposite in my time.
Held at that level by whom, and in what way. You're good with accusations, but very thin on support.
Held by whom. Even if the majority of people viewed things in this way, once again it is an example of personal prejudice, not institutional racism.
Uh, what?.
I think most Blacks in the U.S. know that their from the U.S., and could easily name the U.S., Canada, and Mexico as three countries on the continent from which they hail. And most can speak English, although some rather badly. And they know at least the rudiments of the U.S. electoral process.
Oh. Or are you talking about the fact that I should know something about a continent (Africa) to which I've never been and have only a slight interest in visiting.
I see examples of very high acheiving Blacks all the time. And not just in sports. Of course, God forbid, you may have to decide to look at something other then the TV to do so.
Really? And where did they originate?
Let's break it down: this is not the greatest deficit in human history (see Germany circa WWII, U.S. during the Great Depression). What "extraordinary feats" has Obama done? He hasn't done anything more extraordinary then any other President. He still hasn't been demonized by the Black public, except in the fact that he hasn't been willing to push harder for his agenda. And some of what you are claiming people talked about in "hushed circles" happened with, oh, every opposition group against a President' agenda.
It's funny. I'm all of the things that you're mentioning yet see the world nothing like you do.