Steve
Mostly Harmless
I took him to mean that she wouldnât be part of the school at all, which would be fine.To me, that sounds almost worse. "They get free private lessons just for sleeping with the instructor."
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I took him to mean that she wouldnât be part of the school at all, which would be fine.To me, that sounds almost worse. "They get free private lessons just for sleeping with the instructor."
Hanging out with all of oneâs students is great. Hanging out with some students and not others is problematic. If you canât figure out a way to be inclusive, youâre creating problems.At some point you had to make things complicated somewhere in order to get your wife!
I made plenty of friends at my dojang. There was one family that I would go over to their house for holidays and events. Another couple of guys my age that we'd play board games. A few of the upper belts lived near me and we would meet at a nearby park to practice. Plus several students I would see in the halls at work. At my new BJJ dojo, I've started playing video games with one of my fellow students.
I really miss have that personal relationship with most of my students and their families. It would have been the hardest part about leaving my old dojang, except they are still operating under COVID restrictions and I barely got to talk to people before or after class anymore.
You don't have to hang out with everyone to be inclusive. People who don't have the same interests don't have to partake in the same events.Hanging out with all of oneâs students is great. Hanging out with some students and not others is problematic. If you canât figure out a way to be inclusive, youâre creating problems.
I didn't have any relationship with wife other than dating, so no. We didn't work together or have mutual friends, etc.At some point you had to make things complicated somewhere in order to get your wife!
I made plenty of friends at my dojang. There was one family that I would go over to their house for holidays and events. Another couple of guys my age that we'd play board games. A few of the upper belts lived near me and we would meet at a nearby park to practice. Plus several students I would see in the halls at work. At my new BJJ dojo, I've started playing video games with one of my fellow students.
I really miss have that personal relationship with most of my students and their families. It would have been the hardest part about leaving my old dojang, except they are still operating under COVID restrictions and I barely got to talk to people before or after class anymore.
Not saying you have to hang out with everyone, but everyone should be invited. And if you canât invite everyone thatâs a good indicator youâre on very snarky ground.You don't have to hang out with everyone to be inclusive. People who don't have the same interests don't have to partake in the same events.
Also, if what you are doing with one student is romantic, then it ideally would be limited to one student.
But boss/employee is different from instructor/student. It also depends on why you only hang out with them.Not saying you have to hang out with everyone, but everyone should be invited. And if you canât invite everyone thatâs a good indicator youâre on very snarky ground.
For example, if you are the boss and you have a party and only invite half of your staff, thatâs a breach of many companyâs standards of conduct. Similarly, you wouldnât host a party and require your staff to attend.
Iâm on a phone so itâs hard to adequately explain. But simply out there are some things that are just a bad idea. And itâs often a short step from âbad ideaâ to unethical.
A man must face his own evils ...wise bird doesn't poop in its own nest."
You are assuming the student is helplessly subject to an authority. It's not a public school or military, or a job the student is required to attend by law or livelihood. It's an elective activity. So, there is some difference.Yes, because there is an inherent imbalance of power. It is highly unethical.
The question is whether this is ethical. It is not. I know a guy who ended up marrying a former employee and theyâve stayed married for over 20 years. It happens and they have a wonderful family. But it doesnât change the fact that when he dated an employee he was wrong to do it. And he knew it at the time. It worked out as it sometimes does. But it wasnât ethical.You are assuming the student is helplessly subject to an authority. It's not a public school or military, or a job the student is required to attend by law or livelihood. It's an elective activity. So, there is some difference.
I get it that people (female gender self-identified for the most part - see, I'm trying to be PC. ) are naturally attracted to fit, "high status" guys with personality, but this does not mean they are sheep before the wolf. In my case, the women I was with were all more experienced and usually older than me. Believe me, I was the one who ended up being instructed! (I was a late bloomer.) The only exception was the girl I eventually married.
That said, there are some unethical people who would and do take unfair advantage of those not equipped to deal with them on equal footing. In this case I do agree with your post.
That is what I was going for.Well I agree, but man you said that in the creepiest way possible. Yuck.
If they're not a student, nobody in the class should really care what the instructor did in their spare time, with consenting adults.To me, that sounds almost worse. "They get free private lessons just for sleeping with the instructor."
If they're getting private lessons, they're a student.If they're not a student, nobody in the class should really care what the instructor did in their spare time, with consenting adults.
That is what I was going for.
I took the âprivate lessonsâ to mean something unrelated to martial arts.If they're getting private lessons, they're a student.
This is why I said in my first post that it depends on a ton of factors. It can still feel mandatory to go. You may have friends there. You may have a contract. You may simply feel that if you quit, it means you're weak. Someone in the 18-25 range is still basically a teenager.You are assuming the student is helplessly subject to an authority. It's not a public school or military, or a job the student is required to attend by law or livelihood. It's an elective activity. So, there is some difference.
I get it that people (female gender self-identified for the most part - see, I'm trying to be PC. ) are naturally attracted to fit, "high status" guys with personality, but this does not mean they are sheep before the wolf. In my case, the women I was with were all more experienced and usually older than me. Believe me, I was the one who ended up being instructed! (I was a late bloomer.) The only exception was the girl I eventually married.
That said, there are some unethical people who would and do take unfair advantage of those not equipped to deal with them on equal footing. In this case I do agree with your post.
Maybe. Even so, "you can't do X anymore" is a way abusers isolate their victims, so that would be a bigger red flag to me than dating a student. Especially if X is a self-defense class...I took the âprivate lessonsâ to mean something unrelated to martial arts.
Well I don't think the issue is teacher/student. That covers a lot of ground.If they're getting private lessons, they're a student.
Hahaha, now that's dirty.I took the âprivate lessonsâ to mean something unrelated to martial arts.
This is kind of where I was really going. Many people sign contracts nowadays, in the types of schools I think we're actually talking about in this thread. It could be karate, TKD, BJJ, MMA , whatever, people sign up on paper nowadays.You may have a contract.