Could I have been wrong about my take on our response to illegal immigration? I have favored amnesty and a path towards legal migrant worker status without requiring illegal aliens to first leave and then attempt to return legally. I have been very displeased about various US border states passing (what I consider) extreme laws targeting illegal aliens. I have considered many of those laws to be nativist, bigoted, and in some cases, driven by racism. I have also stated that I did not believe such laws would be effective at all.
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Amer...ation-hits-net-zero?google_editors_picks=true
However...
I think I have to admit that whether I like it or not, those stronger state laws have had an effect on illegal immigration. I also think the overall attitude towards immigrants of all kinds, legal and illegal, has become more negative; legal immigrants are facing more discrimination than they have in the past. I think that in our bad economy, we've become more nativist, more insular, and less tolerant of those who look and behave differently than 'us'.
But I can't argue with the net results with regard to illegal immigration. I said draconian state laws would have no effect on illegal immigration and it did. I was wrong. That doesn't mean I love those laws, I still don't. But I was wrong about what the net results would be.
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Amer...ation-hits-net-zero?google_editors_picks=true
Since the Monitor last visited here in 2007, a major demographic shift has transformed this dusty village of 230. Migrants have come home, and with them have come other important changes. In 2007, there was no running water, no high school, no paved roads. A simple water pipeline, installed in February, runs to each of the 50-some homes. On a recent day the first high school class, including eight students ages 15 to 40, was finishing up math homework. And now, the main roads are paved.
"We can turn on the water and wash our clothes," says Pedro's uncle, Rodolfo Laguna, who spent 12 years working illegally in a chicken plant in Athens, Ga., before returning home in 2010 after both he and his son lost their jobs.
This is the new face of rural Mexico. Villages emptied out in the 1980s and '90s in one of the largest waves of migration in history. Today there are clear signs that a human tide is returning to towns both small and large across Mexico.
One million Mexicans said they returned from the US between 2005 and 2010, according to a new dem-ographic study of Mexican census data. That's three times the number who said they'd returned in the previous five-year period.
And they aren't just home for a visit: One prominent sociologist in the US has counted "net zero" migration for the first time since the 1960s.
However...
The trend began with a weaker economy in the US. But even if a stronger one were to pull many Mexicans back to the US, the new pattern could persist. Migrants – and the experts who study them – say they are deterred by state laws in the US that have fueled anti-immigrant sentiment, tougher US-border enforcement, and border violence.
I think I have to admit that whether I like it or not, those stronger state laws have had an effect on illegal immigration. I also think the overall attitude towards immigrants of all kinds, legal and illegal, has become more negative; legal immigrants are facing more discrimination than they have in the past. I think that in our bad economy, we've become more nativist, more insular, and less tolerant of those who look and behave differently than 'us'.
But I can't argue with the net results with regard to illegal immigration. I said draconian state laws would have no effect on illegal immigration and it did. I was wrong. That doesn't mean I love those laws, I still don't. But I was wrong about what the net results would be.