Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who did? You aren't making sense.Yeah and he quoted YOU
He said that it depends on the TKD school if they punch/kick better, but apparently not the Judo one if they throw/grapple better.
And?The user named Elder999 did.
And?
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
He took your comment to mean that there are TKD schools that focus more than 50% of its training on hand techniques, which it didn't.
Yes, it did. There's at least one, and there are many many more schools where poomsae techniques form the majority of the training.
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Wouldn't this suggest that a lot of it is the emphasis the school places that determines the strengths/weaknesses of the school? Since the curriculum could say 80% hands, but you focus on the 20% kicks, and that makes a TKD school like the one most of visualize as TKD. Or the school could focus on the 80% hands, and it would barely be recognizable as the same art.No because of what I just wrote. TKD instructors do take into account the fact that forms are very hand oriented and to make the art distinctly Korean then spend a majority (not all) of other drills with kicks. This is how it should be as well IMO
Never said exclusively. Plenty of them in Europe.Some obscure school located in South Korea? I know of no Chang Hon school focusing exclusively on forms. But maybe KKW is different.
Wouldn't this suggest that a lot of it is the emphasis the school places that determines the strengths/weaknesses of the school? Since the curriculum could say 80% hands, but you focus on the 20% kicks, and that makes a TKD school like the one most of visualize as TKD. Or the school could focus on the 80% hands, and it would barely be recognizable as the same art.
Did you quote the wrong post? I'm failing to see how that relatesIf you saw me hit mitts, you would probably deduce that my club drills punches a lot. Well, it doesn't. I just have always had good, explosive hands.
Did you quote the wrong post? I'm failing to see how that relates
I wasn't saying a students proficiency, I was saying what the school focuses on.Emphasis does not necessarily determine a schools strength and weaknesses as it relates to the students proficiency. I was still however curious to know how Hapkido schools operate
But, I'm average, if a school spends more time kicks, the students will be better at kicking. If it spends more time on punches, the students will be better at punching. Ignoring anomalies.
I wasn't saying a students proficiency, I was saying what the school focuses on..
One student can be good at punches, while the majority of the school is not. If that's not a focus, that would mean the school is probably weak in that area. Not that the school is weak, but that part of it is weak.What? if a school focuses more on punching, then what? What do you mean by weakness if not what is reflected in the students? How could a school be weak in and of itself? It's just an institution?
One student can be good at punches, while the majority of the school is not. If that's not a focus, that would mean the school is probably weak in that area. Not that the school is weak, but that part of it is weak.