StudentCarl
3rd Black Belt
Gents, I think too many people think martial arts is a cure or treatment for parents who cannot or will not cope with their childrens problems. Martial arts instructors aren't therapists, they aren't specialists in child psychology so why are they taking on children who have special needs?
the OP starts by labelling the child as having weak spirit, another label when it's perhaps as simple as the child doesn't want to be there, he may enjoy some parts but as a whole doesn't want to be there just because members of his family enjoy it doesn't mean to say he does. You are get stuck in this thing about how forcing them to do martial arts is good for the child, what bollocks. It's good for them if they want to do it not if they don't. It might be as simple too as the child needs a rest from martial arts and would benefit for picking it up later.
Don't bother getting sanctimonious with me and on your high horses, I say what I mean and if you don't like it don't read it. I am passionate about child welfare and labelling children as disabled because they have a small part of their brain not working or because their father lost a leg in Afghan and they have behavioural probelms coming to terms with that is cruel as is labelling a child as weak spirited because he doesn't come up to parent's or instructors expectations makes me very sad.
Helping children isn't making them do something they don't want to do, it's understanding the child, I gave some advice, it doesn't have to be taken but the remedy given by ATC was to force the child onto a military type regime to force it to take part. To bully the child into coming up to scratch basically and you think I'm twisted, wow. How many children's classes have you actually instructed btw? How many martial arts clubs/schools do you run?
I'm sure Bob even now is wading through your complaints about me - again :lol:
Say what you want, gents but I'm not going to add to a child's unhappiness just because the parents can't cope or have 'issues'. there's specialists for that.
Tez,
I respect that your heart is clearly centered on the growth of your students, but I think you sometimes get emotional and defensive, which distracts from the exchange of ideas. Related to teaching kids:
1. We all seem to agree that people should be treated as individuals. In answer to your above comment about special needs students, that's precisely why we DO accept and work with them. It doesn't mean we're trying to be psychologists, but I suspect we all believe that TKD has something to offer everyone. If not, let's discuss.
2. Labeling people is different from labeling symptoms, traits or behaviors. I believe it is essential to accurately label what we're seeing. Good praise is specific. Good teaching begins with accurately labeling what is to be changed. There's a big difference between saying that someone has a trait or behavior and believing that those things are permanent and unchangeable. The error is in believing that a person cannot change, an error I don't think is being made in this discussion. I do think we all have to make decisions about whether/when our expectations are realistic--I think that is really the heart of this discussion.
3. There is a line between making people do what they don't want to and leading them to exceed their perceived limitations. I suspect that all of us here have learned that the body is capable of much more than the mind often believes. Often, in my experience, the "what people don't want to do" is leave their comfort zone to work hard or take risks. The true art of teaching is leading a student to successfully stretch beyond their perceived limits. Some people are more ready for that than others, and the real master develops the ability to identify when is the time to challenge the student and when is the time to let them refine where they are now. The effective instructor balances challenge with success so that students have a postive experience. I have yet to meet someone who doesn't want that.
Carl