Yeah, sometimes I even reply to myself.Well, I just post in response to everything. The carpet-bombing approach to forum participation gives me an edge.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, sometimes I even reply to myself.Well, I just post in response to everything. The carpet-bombing approach to forum participation gives me an edge.
Other than long range kicking, advanced Martial kicking has a fairly large repotoire of close in kicks.
Also, countering getting your kick caught is one of the sweetest moves. Back in competition days the book on me by coaches to their fighters was “do not catch his kick, especially if he gives it to you”
I agree with you with your definition of a punch, but I think of a kick as any kind of strike done with the legs or feet and in lots of martial arts knee strikes are referred to as kicks.I agree with that - I don't tend to include them in "kicks". To me "punch" is something with a fist (anything else from the arm is still an "arm strike", which includes punches), and "kick" involves the foot or near-foot (as with a shin strike from a round kick), and all the others are "leg strikes", which include kicks and knees.
No arguments there. My instructors have just always not included them in the term, and I picked up the habit.I agree with you with your definition of a punch, but I think of a kick as any kind of strike done with the legs or feet and in lots of martial arts knee strikes are referred to as kicks.
Yep, which goes back to my earlier post that it would need a better kicker than me.And as I said, a person with good footwork would be able to put themselves in good positions to land kicks with the feet, even if their opponent is bringing the pressure on.
I can not imagine letting someone catch my leg in a fight.
This must have been a point tournaments.
I don't think I have ever seen Joe Lewis or Bill Superfoot Wallace let someone catch their leg.
Obviously, I never got kicked by either man, but I was expecting that to be the answer. And the speed of Wallace's kicks, I think I'd look silly getting kicked THEN grabbing the empty air where that leg was when it kicked me. Then, of course, since my arm is busy trying to grab a leg that isn't there, he'd be able to kick me again. Best not to try.It was two seperate thoughts. One was to the question posed in the OP, the other to the offshoot subject of having a kick caught. And, yup, it was in competitions, both points and in the ring.
As for Joe and Bill, having trained with both, you would be better off trying to catch a Cadillac speeding down hill. I once asked Joe to kick some kicking shields I was holding as hard as he could with a sidekick. He told me I really didn't want to do that. But being a pain in the butt I was persistent.
Not my brightest moment. All I can say is HO-LEE f''n shhh...
For a lot of reasons I put a knee more in the same category of a punch. Closer and quicker than a kick. Plus if not done properly or done by someone who doesn't kick a lot, a kick can put you in an awkward position.No arguments there. My instructors have just always not included them in the term, and I picked up the habit.
Yep, which goes back to my earlier post that it would need a better kicker than me.
Obviously, I never got kicked by either man, but I was expecting that to be the answer. And the speed of Wallace's kicks, I think I'd look silly getting kicked THEN grabbing the empty air where that leg was when it kicked me. Then, of course, since my arm is busy trying to grab a leg that isn't there, he'd be able to kick me again. Best not to try.
I went to an Indianapolis seminar in 1986 with Wallace and his professional trainer Ronin Harrison. @Buka, you are correct about his kick. I have never seen anyone who could repeatedly kick as many times so effortlessly. It did not matter whether he was static or moving forward/backward. Something he really drilled during the seminar. Ronin was stronger and probably had better overall endurance but Bill was just so smooth and evasive. An amazing man.Wallace is an interesting study IMO. You can look at all the film on him you want, from tournaments, PKA, seminars, whatever, and yeah, he looks good, but not much different from other people. But when you're actually facing his kicks they are unlike anything I've ever seen in Martial Arts.
In seminars, he is a wealth of knowledge due to his experience and eduction - but you could train with him every day of your life and will never kick like him. I don't mean kick as well as him, you just can't kick like him at all. It's so so different.
Yes, Jim "Ronin" Harrison. Totally agree with your comment.I imagine you're referring to Jim Harrison? Now there's a seriously bad m'fker.
We used to say you only need two things to fight Jim Harrison. A high powered rifle and a handgun.
That way, if you miss with the rifle you can use the handgun on yourself.
The way you describe him (I’ve never heard of Harrison before), he sounds to me like the late, great William Oliver. By all accounts, and I know plenty of people who’ve trained alongside and under him, he was smooth, effortless, fast and strong.I went to an Indianapolis seminar in 1986 with Wallace and his professional trainer Ronin Harrison. @Buka, you are correct about his kick. I have never seen anyone who could repeatedly kick as many times so effortlessly. It did not matter whether he was static or moving forward/backward. Something he really drilled during the seminar. Ronin was stronger and probably had better overall endurance but Bill was just so smooth and evasive. An amazing man.
I was going to send you a message when I noticed 3300 likes were taken of by 12 dislikes, that 275 likes per 1 dislike.I imagine you're referring to Jim Harrison? Now there's a seriously bad m'fker.
We used to say you only need two things to fight Jim Harrison. A high powered rifle and a handgun.
That way, if you miss with the rifle you can use the handgun on yourself.
Am I missing something? What are you talking about?I was going to send you a message when I noticed 3300 likes were taken of by 12 dislikes, that 275 likes per 1 dislike.
Your like, dislike program is crazy! I thought 1 dislike being worth 14 likes was bad, but that's nothing compare to what it did to you.
The way you describe him (I’ve never heard of Harrison before), he sounds to me like the late, great William Oliver. By all accounts, and I know plenty of people who’ve trained alongside and under him, he was smooth, effortless, fast and strong.
@Buka has competed against him (why wouldn’t he have ). Is/was Harrison along the same lines as Oliver, Buka? Would it be possible to catch Oliver’s kick or at least live to tell about it if you did?
The "positive ratings received" is a total of other ratings. My current rating:You have 9507 likes and 36 dislikes.
gpseymour
9507 -5072 = 4435 /36 = 123
Buka
8320-5016=3304/12 = 275
Your right I must be missing something.
Thank you. Wish I could give you a like to go with the useful.The "positive ratings received" is a total of other ratings. My current rating:
5075 like + 3114 agree + 1122 funny +134 informative + 40 useful = 9485. Add in the 25 dislikes, and you get 9510, so apparently dislikes actually add to the positive ratings (which seems odd). In summary, the "Positive Ratings Received" is apparently a total of everything except "Disagree".