cfr
Black Belt
Glad you liked it! :ultracool
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
cfr said:As stated Im really a middle of the roader. Every time this debate comes up I ask the same things to the TMA guys, and have yet to get an answer.
1; If a TMA guy and an MMA guy got into a fight, what makes you think the MMA guy would stick to rules? Whilst my training much more resembles MMA than TMA, if I got into a real fight, Id pick up the nearest weapon and attempt to smack you in the head with it. Do you really think MMA guys are too dumb to realize they're not in a cage?
2; Why do you think TMA doesnt have rules? Wouldnt pulling a punch be considered a rule? You dont really eye gouge, neck strike, groin kick in training do you? Of course not, it's against the dojo rules. Plus there would be nobody to train with.
Another point, for every MMA guy that has all UFC fights memorized and thinks he can fight like Lidell, there is a TMA guy that is practicing his deadly techs against the air, convinced that they would work against a resisting opponent. Both sides have dorks in fantasy land.
Kensai said:I think you'll find Mr XS that it's TMA that's better!
no it isn't
yes it is
no it isn't
yes it is
no it isn't
yes it is
no it isn't
yes it is
no it isn't
yes it is
no it isn't
yes it is
no it isn't
etc etc etc etc etc etc...
I wont waste any more of your or my time in trying to discuss this with you since you seem more ready to give and take offence than to listen with an open mind
upnorthkyosa said:When your teaching objectives become separated from what you are doing in class, then the teacher is engaging in bad teaching. In TMA alot of stuff was deleted and alot of stuff was made up and it ended up separating various arts from the objective of defending oneself.
IMHO, the bottom line is that all arts, if taught well to the objectives they claim, can be effective.
Odin said:lol I know what your saying bro,the thing i didnt mean this to be a MMA vs TMA thread, I only wanted to hear if MMA has changed the opinions of people or if they now see the benefits of training in more then one art.
Odin said:I may be wrong but I was always under the assumtion that TMA were battlefield arts designed for fighting?
this may be wrong I do understand what you are saying but then like I said before,in mma we have different teachers that train their art the traditional way,I am being taught traditional Muay thai, traditional jujitsu (without the gi,which is not traditional but still utilizes tradional theories and techniques) and traditional greco roman.
I do understand what yuo are saying though.
cfr said:I know this comment was not directed at me, but my apologies for wandering off topic.