I'd say keep it the way it is. By doing this, you'll carry on the art as he taught it.
Why can't we continue to evolve it as he evolved it?
He encouraged innovation and creativity. People would approach him with things they'd come up with, and he'd say, "Oh WOW! That is a good idea!"
We should stop that now that he's gone?
We've seen this argument elsewhere with other systems. While there is nothing wrong with attempting to archive a set of techniques or a methodology for historical purposes, stopping the growth of that art with the death of its founder isn't useful.
I'd also suggest that "keeping it the way it is [was]" is going to be impossible. Each of us will, inspite of our best efforts, modify what he showed us to fit ourselves, our students, our situation in life. Each of us colored Modern Arnis with our original styles. The Kenpo folks did the Anyos with a Kenpo-ish style of movement. The Tae Kwon Do guys did the forms more the way a Korean stylist would. Remy never tried to change that. He understood the process and he understood individuality.
When teaching our own students, many of us created our own curriculum and ordered the material the way we thought best. We broke it down in a way our students could understand it. We added our own analogies, we tweaked the drills a bit, we played with concepts and experimented. He'd see that, and again, with great drama, say "Oh WOW! That is a good idea!"
There are traditionalists out there who claim to be teaching their arts EXACTLY the way it has been handed down for generations and hundreds of years. This is unverifiable and highly unlikely. Arts evolve, no matter how hard we try to lock them into concrete. If they don't, they cease to become arts.
Art, whether it is martial or not, is a form of self expression and a reflection of contemporary culture. It is a process of creativity. and change. The term "Modern" suggests that the art be kept up to date.
So back to the original discussion, are we looking for deeper understanding and hidden treasures in Modern Arnis as the Professor gave us, or are we looking to make it our own in a sense that it becomes something of an off shoot of the original and thus something else?
You search for those meanings and treasures with your own preconceptions and experiences in place, and they influence your illumination.
At that point the art has in fact become something else...your art. Not mine, not anyone else's...yours. It has changed and evolved.
A progressive martial art, founded by a progressive martial artist, needs to move forward.
Regards,
Steve Scott
P.S.
Dan...you contradicted yourself. You said earlier you were going to break it down so ANYBODY could be as skillful as Remy. Later you suggested that if you put your life on hold and immersed yourself in the crucible of his experiences (an impossibility) THEN you'd be able to attain his level. Which is it?
You didn't make your point. You confounded it.