Originally posted by Kaith Rustaz
Heres another question. Who will reconize the promotion?
To some, grading 'stopped' with Remys death. To others, they are working with the established organizations on promotion. Still the question remains...who will make the determination?
Since the organizations usually set the curiculum, if you aren't familiar with it, how can you test it?
Will either IMAF reconize a promotion done by the WMAA? Will MARPPIO reconize an IMAF promotion? If its done by an independent board, why should they?
With all due respect to you my friend because we have had some face to face conversations I have to disagree with your position.
First and foremost, the decision to acknowledge and recognize any persons paper ranking is a matter of personal preference.
The IMAFs, Marppio and WMAA are at loggerheads over who is best representing and preserving the art as taught be Remy Presas, why are you asking such a nonsense question? The answer is fairly obvious to all, when none of the above have necessarily accepted ranks given out by the late Professor. There is also the small matter of monetary motive.
None of the people who will be sitting on the testing/promotions board at the Symposium are so ego-driven that we will assert and promise that others will accept our recommendations with regard to rank - it is after all is said and done, just another sheet of paper. BUT, part of the problem in Modern Arnis right now is that too many individuals, regardless of group affiliation are not ready to work in a cooperative manner. Just look at the lack of cooperation and endorsement of the Symposium as just one example.
Are you going to attend the Symposium? If not why not? It is being held in your city. One of the featured instructors is your instructor and system president. There are numerous people on the program whom you have never worked with or trainied under for even one hour in your life. It would be greast to have you attend and compare for yourself.
Originally posted by Kaith Rustaz
To some, grading 'stopped' with Remys death. To others, they are working with the established organizations on promotion. Still the question remains...who will make the determination?
[/B]
That is the crux of the problem isn't it? For some people it seems that everything is focused on what Remy did and said before he died. Does that mean that life stops and nothing can change? In my case the answer is a resounding NO! There is most certinly life after Remy and the Symposium is just ONE WAY of making connectioins with other people and other ideas within a very large field of action under the name Modern Arnis.
Originally posted by Kaith Rustaz
Having trained with many kenpoists, I see problems. School a does a technique one way, school b has made its own 'tweaks' and school c uses a newer reference guide. So, who determines which is right? I've seen a few of the seniors move. They dont move the same. Sometimes, they conflict each other when 'correcting' students. Why? Because they each see things differently.
[/B]
Has it ever occured to you and others who want to deny differences that "a", "b" and "c" could all be right. That what works for me might work for you if you do it EXACTLY as I have done it. But if you are allowed and encouraged to modify the technique to suit your own body and skill level that you can make this technique work as effectively as I can make the "orignal" work for me!
I remember Remy telling us to "Make it for yourself!" He says the samething on his 1986 video series, several times. That statement is the spiritual driver for the Symposium. Let's see how some people have made the art for themselves. Cloning at my schools is not an option for consideration.
Since you are writing about "Having trained with many kenpoist", I am left with ther impression that you have not studied kenpo as a seperate art. I am only going by what you have written. Since I was at the Gathering of Eagles in 2001, I can tell you that a great deal of the differences are perpetuated by students and low ranking blackbelt holders. The Seniors and Grand Masters at the event were quite supportive of one another. GM Bill Chun, Jr., showed us the "hard" and "soft" variations of the very same techniques and he was applauded and assisted by Seniors and GMs from other kenpo organizations. The decision to accept or reject is personal not systemic.
Originally posted by Kaith Rustaz
Unless this idea is done carefully, it runs the risk of being clasified as nothing more than a 'certificate mill'. (See the Bad Budo forum for definitions).
[/B]
It is damn near impossible to have a 'certificate mill' at a ONE TIME EVENT! The board will be together for one and possibly two days. There are no plans to keep the board alive beyond July 13, 2003. You and your siupporters are grasping at straws because YOU DO NOT HAVE ANY credible information about the board and its operational philosophy. Why not wait until you have information from me, before you jump up and get critical?
Originally posted by Kaith Rustaz
Another question is, how many levels will folks jump? A few people haven't been promoted in a heck of a long time. We all jump on Ms. McManus for getting her 3rd a few weeks after she got her 2nd. So, we gonna jump a few folks from 3rd to 8th? Why? If you're gonna do that, what meaning does any of the rank have? I think we have enough paper black belts in the arts as it is.
My opinion is, I agree with bloodwood.
[/B]
Now that you have put Ms. McManus's name forward in the same pharagraph that you mention that some people "...haven't been promoted in a heck of a long time." Why did you go running head long into a discussion without first having the facts? The testing/promotions board is intended to address precisely that latter problem that you have mentioned above. How many levels, if any will be people be bumped? I do not know. There is no one in line to be tested as of today AND the board would have to decide that on a case by case basis - IF it were necessary. I will not rule out a couple of levels jump, but I would also be VERY surprised if the board members would be inclined to go more than ONE STEP UP. The McManus promotion did not sit well with any of us.
Since you have mentioned Ms. McManus and by inference Delaney and the IMAF, why would you fail to mention Tim Hartman being promoted by his students. Outside of the WMAA, that raised more than a few eyebrows. I know, in May the signatures of Dr. Gyi and GM Jornales were added to the document and announced. But that was an AFTER THE FACT occurence wasn't it? I have suggested that it would have been better if the two GMs concurrece could have been announced at the time the promotion was made public. One high ranking WMAA offical sent me a private message acknowledging that there was an error in timing and perhaps waiting until the May Camp in Buffalo would have been a better idea. I agree with him.
In addition I would suggest that you check the thread opened by Dieter on rank advancement in November 2002 and read my post where I stated that I am opposed to students promoting their instructors. That post was written months BEFORE the WMAA Advisory Board took it's action. My position on this matter has nothing to do with Tim Hartman as an individual. It is both a philosophical and organizational issue with me.
We do not allow students to determine teacher tenure and pay raises in public or private schools, why would the martial arts be any different? The deed is done. But lets also look at who sent in the congratulation posts after the promotion was announced - primarily members of the club - WMAA members and friends of Tim's. To take the position that these posts constitute an impartial and objective endorsement by Tim's peers is both foolish and myopic.
If people test before the Symposium Board, their instructors will not be sitting on the board for the test. The testing/promotions board at the Symposium is interested in giving an objective measure of martial skills.
BTW, I will give you and others one piece of information about the testing - it will only be open to people who have attained a Lakan or higher ratining in Modern Arnis.
Jerome Barber, Ed.D.