Well, thats not hard, membership is cheap... and I only bring this up so the excuse that people can't really do it because they have to be Bujinkan doesn't come up as the cop out...
NOT, BTW, that I would be advocating this sort of behavior...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, thats not hard, membership is cheap... and I only bring this up so the excuse that people can't really do it because they have to be Bujinkan doesn't come up as the cop out...
I'd concur that this has become a really stupid discussion.
And as for training in the honbu having to be a member, well no one checked my card when I was there. Among the 100 that were there I don't think anyone would have that hard a time coming in.
But the conversation is just sad.
You know even if I thought I had the secret to knocking down Nagato for instance (I don't) I wouldn't out of respect, why are we entertaining this.
Excellent point - I don't come from a Ninjutsu school but I know exactly what you mean.And I do not know how I can do the type of training I have done when there is just a few of us trusted students in the dojo here......
I'd like to hear you describe what unfolded that allowed you to choke him out, or him you.
All the best,
-ben
Should I take this to mean that Nagato of BBT and Tanemura of Genbukan are available to such matches? If that is the case, it should not be too difficult to find them appropriately matched opponents who would be more then willing to try them out.
Ben I really do not think that there is massive sparring of any sort within Genbukan. All I have seen is a little bit of work with a Shinai and only targeting the wrists. (which had gloves on it) No I am not disparaging the Genbukan or Soke Tanemura (He is great at what he does) in any way just based on what I have seen and heard from several Genbukan practitioners. The Genbukan, Jinekan and Bujinkan are very close in their training methodologies with slight but subtle nuances to each. Soke Hatsumi who taught Tanemura Sensei and Manaka Sensei is definately more focused on flow and letting go and being able to move in the moment. Tanemura Sensei is more thorough and wants his students to be precise. (nothing wrong with that) Manaka Sensei is moving in his own direction as well. However all three bear striking similarities to the other. (how could they not)
Richard I applaud you for training and taking your training in a direction that you see fit. However, I have noticed that you seem to be out to prove something here and are pushing ever so slightly in that direction.
Just enough but not too much. (if you catch my drift) MartialTalk is a forum geared towards friendly martial discussion. I would like to see you make some posts regarding positive training that you have had in the
Genbukan and also why you like this or that type of training within the
Genbukan.
I think that the title of this thread is a pretty clear hint that anyone that does not train the way he wants us to is doing so because we are afraid.
The way I understand it you're free to jump any Shihan in the Bujinkan including Hatsumi.
Hello, respectfully, I would like to say that what you know of the genbukan is very limited, as that is the way the genbukan is. So seeing things online, believe me you are not seeing much. Talking to Genbukan people? There is MUCH they will not tell you.
The ONLY way to know what the Genbukan is, is to join, develop a relationship with a teacher and go from there.
And please, people, try to understand that *I* am NOT THE GENBUKAN I am me! I still teach JKD, Kali and grappling and have all these years! It is not like I joined the genbukan and gave up everything else I know.. I am talking about sparring and drilling as an INDIVIDUAL, not as an organization. Please see that and I think allot of useless posts will be stopped (not saying yours is useless mind you)
You are incorrect...
I have specific feelings towards training, there have been some threads about reality training, so I am expressing my views on that subject and that is all. I have different views on different subjects...
Is ben cole out to "prove something"? I ask that honestly.. What about Don Roley? Both of these gentelmen have VERY strong opinionated views on things, have they been accused of being out to prove something?
I disagree with much of what each writes, and also I AGREE with allot of what they write, but even when I disagree I do not think they are out to "prove something" I feel they have strong opinions on certain subjects that's all.
It is a discussion forum right? Where we can debate?
Or only are we allowed to agree with the masses, does the "mob rule"?
Because once you have seen something for yourself, you cannot go back.
Finally you are in the Traditional Ninjutsu section of the forum where we generally discuss Budo Taijutsu training. You are advocating that you know the true way and it is so clear. (note I am not disagreeing with you there just questioning) However in Budo Taijutsu which is the forerunner of any of the X-Kans you are starting or trying to push people that know about Budo Taijutsu training better than yourself that the training methodology coming out of japan is a fantasy. (do you see why some people now might be upset with that)
This forum is for the discussion of the X-Kan families. They are: BujinKan, Genbukan and JinenKan
Which is exactly what I was trying to get across in my recent inputs to "the rant thread". Too much sparring tends to close people's minds as to the possibilities taijutsu offers.
I agree with you too much sparring could be very counter productive. So can too much kata only, too much henka only etc..
Balance neh?
Incorrect.
I do not think *I* know the "true" way to train Budo Taijutsu. I suppose that hatsumi San would be the once for that as it is his creation not mine. I was never stating that at all!
I was however stating that BEYOND systems Kans, Styles, there are people! And that each PERSON irrespective of their "affiliations" owe it to themselves to gain EXPERIENCE and KNOW for themselves. That is it in a nutshell.
For example, I think Randori is essential for an INDIVIDUAL in order for that person to KNOW what they can and cannot do. I never said it would make "budo taijutsu better" To get good at "budo Taijutsu" follow what your kan-cho is telling you as best you can.
However Just being good at any "style" does not assure you that you yourself can handle various attacks. As an example, there is a well known incident where a person of VERY high rank and one considered VERY good at Budo Taijutsu was man handled by a BJJ beginner in front of a group of people. His being very good at BBT didn't help much in that case did it? The man was helpless...
There have been people who were "VERY GOOD" at JKD and went into a situation and got there butts handed to them! One of my old teachers Burt Richardson was WORLD CLASS at kali, he went into a Dog brothers contest and had his head handed to him.
You see my point yet?
I am not trying to tell people how to get good at BBT. not at all, don't listen to me on that one, listen to your kan-Cho!
I am sharing my strong opinion that each of us owe it to ourselves to "step into the light" of self discovery as individuals not styles and be honest with ourselves. I am not "telling" people they HAVE TO DO IT. I am however of a strong bent in that direction and I hope my obvious enthusiasm might inspire others in a simialr direction, simply because I sincerely believe it would be good for them.
However I must say that I didn't know that this was for Budo taijutsu discussion because I thought it read:
Now that I know this I will respectfully bow out.
In addition I feel I have went out of my way to be respectful here, you feel it is not enough...
I think there might be other issues at work personally, but who knows. It just mightbe a bit too touchey feely for me heare.
but thanks for the invite non the less.
Take care,
Richard you are not going to get an argument from me on some of what you say. However it is more the way you phrase things and try to promote those things. You cannot mask brazen or disrepectful as a strong opinon. Take for example the start of this particular post : Incorrect or that you refer to Hatsumi Soke as hatsumi San. Or the use of Kan-Cho instead of as you well know what is used in the Bujinkan is Shidoshi or Shihan. I would not refer to Tanemura Soke as anything other than Tanemura Soke or Sensei.
For myself in IRT I have plenty of sparring. However generally in Bujinkan, Genbukan or Jinekan training as taught in Japan there is not much. (this we all know)
A strong well formed and well written opinoin is generally appreciated by all. I would like most of your opinons if they were slightly worded differently. These then would conform nicely with how MartialTalk is viewed as a friendly martial arts forum.