I read that post without looking at who wrote it, and had no doubt that the author was you.I clicked agree because I don't not disagree with nothing you didn't say.
Possibly.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I read that post without looking at who wrote it, and had no doubt that the author was you.I clicked agree because I don't not disagree with nothing you didn't say.
Possibly.
I have just realized that people in this forum like to use "do not disagree" instead of "agree". What's the difference between "do not disagree" vs. "agree"? Your thought?
I used to have a co-worker who likes to say, "I may agree with you right now, but I reserve my right not to if I can find any good reason for it." Even today, I still don't know why did he talk that way.
Why should one make his life so complicate? IMO, one should have the courage to love, and also the courage to hate.you say something I consider true but not a counterpoint to what I said, so despite the fact that I don’t disagree, we are still on opposite sides of the issue.
Why should one make his life so complicate? IMO, one should have the courage to love, and also the courage to hate.
- I agree with you 100% there.
- Sorry that I have to disagree with you on this.
I could do that, but it lacks the nuance. It's not about courage, but about trying to communicate.Why should one make his life so complicate? IMO, one should have the courage to love, and also the courage to hate.
- I agree with you 100% there.
- Sorry that I have to disagree with you on this.
first, I disagree with this premise. Someone asking for feedback is asking for feedback, which may or may not be helpful.If someone asks for feedback then the goal should be to help.
That's a great example actually. Heck, Taco Bell is arguably not really food, but I still like it.Not everything is black and white. There are some things I am neutral on. There are somethings I am indifferent on. There are some things where I might agree with you on one variable, but not another.
For example, if I say "I like Taco Bell" and someone says "Taco Bell isn't real Mexican food", I can say "I don't disagree [that it's not real Mexican food]...but I still like it."
Your best line so far in 2019, Steve.Bottom line, there is no one right answer, as you are suggesting. I think if you trained BJJ, you would understand it better.
I agree with you 78% but I reserve my right to only agree with you 77% tomorrow.Not everything is black and white.
That's a great example actually. Heck, Taco Bell is arguably not really food, but I still like it.
Seriously, that's one of the nuanced situations I was getting at in my post a moment ago. There can be a small, but real, difference between "I agree it's not really Mexican food." and "I don't disagree that it's not Mexican food." For me, often the latter implies there's an argument to be made, but that it's not worth it (usually because it's not pertinent to the point at hand).
I'll never not tell.When I saw the notification that you "agreed" with my post, I wondered if you really agreed, or if that's the closest thing since there's no "don't disagree" button.
Maybe. I guess.I could do that, but it lacks the nuance. It's not about courage, but about trying to communicate.
It's possible to agree (or disagree) unenthusiastically, which is where some of this nuance helps out.
Best Twitter exchange I ever read.That's a great example actually. Heck, Taco Bell is arguably not really food, but I still like it.
Seriously, that's one of the nuanced situations I was getting at in my post a moment ago. There can be a small, but real, difference between "I agree it's not really Mexican food." and "I don't disagree that it's not Mexican food." For me, often the latter implies there's an argument to be made, but that it's not worth it (usually because it's not pertinent to the point at hand).
This is absolute true.Sometimes, not giving you detailed feedback is the most helpful, even if it’s not immediately satisfying to you.
first, I disagree with this premise. Someone asking for feedback is asking for feedback, which may or may not be helpful.
Second, people often ask for help because it’s easy to have someone else spoonfeed you an answer. Sometimes, not giving you detailed feedback is the most helpful, even if it’s not immediately satisfying to you.
Not all feedback is helpful, even if it’s honest, Just ain’t true.I'm only quoting bits that are relevant, and I'm discarding what's less useful
Feedback is always helpful in one way or another, and in varying degrees. A person may not like the feedback, but as long as it's honest it can be used. That person has to choose to use it though.
It's not about being spoonfed an answer, because there's very rarely just one answer anyway.
Probably true, but I can't come up with an example off the top of my head, other than rude feedback or the like. Can you feed me one?Not all feedback is helpful, even if it’s honest, Just ain’t true.
Feedback that’s just plain wrong and/or conflicts with what’s being done.Probably true, but I can't come up with an example off the top of my head, other than rude feedback or the like. Can you feed me one?
That's a good point. We could stretch to say it lets us learn something about the person giving feedback, but I think that's really stretching the point. So, yeah, we could classify that as "not useful".Feedback that’s just plain wrong.
Incompetent feedback, and that’s much harder to identify if you lack the experience to recognize it as incompetent. This is why I am such a fan of actual experience.Probably true, but I can't come up with an example off the top of my head, other than rude feedback or the like. Can you feed me one?