On top of the first case we now have ...
This is what I was saying about courts martial. Despite expert medical opinion they still convicted him. The weapon was presented to him by the Iraqis and he intended to give it to his mess to display. What gets me is that he had to plaed guilty because if he'd pleaded not guilty they would have given him a longer senrence, as I said courts martial are basically there to decid punishment not guilt or innocence.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/9669410/SAS-war-hero-jailed-after-betrayal.html