Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oy. Now who can argue with that? No wait, who can believe that?PeachMonkey said:1)2)You see, liberals fought for things that all of us take for granted like time off, and safe food and water and air and medicine, and the end of child labor, and the vote for women, and civil rights for everyone in America, and the end of unjust wars, and continue to struggle everyday for these sorts of things in the face of incalculable pressures.
So if you happen to agree with somebody on a few issues you are with them lock stock and barrel?rmcrobertson said:If you'll espouse some ideas different from Coulter, Savage et al, I promise to start believing that your ideas come from some other sources.
1. Well as I have only listened to Rush a handful of times and never really listened to the rest. (I dont have cable). I guess I dont. Apparently I do share some of their viewpoints as you always seem to point it out.rmcrobertson said:1. Didn't you tell us that you never paid any attention to them?
2. It isn't a point or two of agreement. It's the almost-verbatim repetition of their claims, and the refusal to look at the other sides--of which there are several.
3. Knowldege is democratic. You only have to read.
ginshun said:rmcrobertson,
Nobody ever admits to being a liberal. Its funny, even liberals think that being called a liberal is an insult.
huz-ZAH!PeachMonkey said:2) Many of us "liberals" are quite proud of the term, actually (as well as of other terms people use as insults, like "socialist"). You see, liberals fought for things that all of us take for granted like time off, and safe food and water and air and medicine, and the end of child labor, and the vote for women, and civil rights for everyone in America, and the end of unjust wars, and continue to struggle everyday for these sorts of things in the face of incalculable pressures.
Technopunk said:Liberal = We're all in this together. As long as you belive like us. Othewise you are a stupid uneducated parrot, and we know whats best for you because we are better.
There ya go again "Squak Squak, Parroting Rush, Squak Squak, Parroting Anne... They are all stupid"rmcrobertson said:1. Please illustrate points at which your ideas are significantly different from Limbaugh, Coulter, et al--who, by the way, are the opposite of intellectuals.
Parents can be psychotic, hardcore christian ones doubly so.. There would be parents forcing their children to give birth just to punish them (such cases do exest IRL). Another child born without a father and into a family that embraces hate is not what the world needs.ginshun said:Link to story
Let me premise by saying that I do not think that abortion should be illegal, in most instances, and I am for the death penalty in murder cases.
So over the past month or so now, we have found that the Supreme Court has stated that a 17 year old does not posess the judgment skills to be responsible enough to face the death penalty, regardless of the situation of the crime, and yet a 17 year old is perfectly capable of deciding that they need an abortion, without even telling her parents.
Does this seem a little odd to anyone else? To me, the two decisions seem to totally contradict each other.
What do you guys think
[/size][/font]