Ah, but he didn't ask for exacts. He asked for preferences.How would I know it all depends on the situation and what's available. You can't say exactly what you'd do because there's far to many possibilities in a fight
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ah, but he didn't ask for exacts. He asked for preferences.How would I know it all depends on the situation and what's available. You can't say exactly what you'd do because there's far to many possibilities in a fight
Cop out, mano.... What do you "try" to make open? Which way would you move or manipulate to get... where?
I think the reason you are getting a hard time is the answer is always "depends". It's like asking a person if you are playing rock-paper-scissors which do you play? Sometimes its best to get on the inside, other times it's best to get on the outside.
Sound basic tactical advice for striking engagement in initial stages of fight, but doesn't actually answer my question. Go behind the lead arm or step offline into the open space where their centerline is available (groin, belly, solar plex, throat)?
If you think
- you are better than your opponent, you enter through his front door.
- your opponent is better than you, you enter through his side door.
If you can get to your opponent's "side door", you can get to his "back door".And if you are fighting with prison rules you enter through his........never mind.
If you can get to your opponent's "side door", you can get to his "back door".
The following terms are commonly used in wrestling.Well this got awkward
Andrew, I get that everyone is trying to reduce my theoretical inquiry into preferred method to an actual tactical problem. I'm really only after preference, what you/they would prefer to do if given the opportunity or you/they can manufacture the opportunity.I think the reason you are getting a hard time is the answer is always "depends". It's like asking a person if you are playing rock-paper-scissors which do you play? Sometimes its best to get on the inside, other times it's best to get on the outside.
The Japanese term for that spot... it was bugging me all week last week. I could not remember for the life of me what the term is for that. I called JW, but he didn't answer. I called Nick Lowry,a nd he knew what it was I was taking about but he's developing old-timers like me as well, so he suggested I call Patrick Parker. Pat is a good guy, and a great teacher, and Nick considers him to be the encyclopedia of all things Japanese arts.In general, I prefer closing them off. I like to get just behind a shoulder - what I sometimes call the "creepy position" (because you can whisper creepy stuff in their ear). From there, I have a lot of grappling and striking options, and they have few. If I can't make it that far back, I'll still usually prefer being outside that arm. It reduces their weaponry in most of the same ways, and I really like beating on floating ribs and temples.
That's a term I've never heard before. Now I have a new word to use with folks who use the Japanese terms! And it's a sufficiently creepy term, too.The Japanese term for that spot... it was bugging me all week last week. I could not remember for the life of me what the term is for that. I called JW, but he didn't answer. I called Nick Lowry,a nd he knew what it was I was taking about but he's developing old-timers like me as well, so he suggested I call Patrick Parker. Pat is a good guy, and a great teacher, and Nick considers him to be the encyclopedia of all things Japanese arts.
The term is shikaku, meaning "the dead angle." I don't know if dead angle means if the person is at that angle to you, you're dead, or what, but it seems appropo.
Gotcha. Sound, imo. Of course, Wang's inside route is sound, too, assuming he gets there fastest with the mostest. Being inside in front is devastating when in control.
I told my wife that exact thing after I read your post. She agreed that "dead angle" is sufficiently creepy, too. So, at a school where they don't use Japanese terms, whispering "dead angle" has a very nice creepiness factor.You can say it creepily, like out of the corner of your mouth, mumbling...shikaku...shikaku...
Yeah, and I have problems there sometimes. I can get oddly linear (not even angular, just linear) when I'm sparring with someone less skilled. I think I pay too much attention to what they are seeing, rather than my own sparring. And I get hit a lot more than I should in those situations because I sit in that middle position too much. And I'm getting slower on my changes and less able to change levels as my knees get worse, so I can't recover from that error like I once could.So long as you are throwing effective punches. And effective can be kind of tricky. If they cover or counter you should be moving.
Lots of guys get knocked out or taken down because they get too ambitious in that middle position.
Yeah, and I have problems there sometimes. I can get oddly linear (not even angular, just linear) when I'm sparring with someone less skilled. I think I pay too much attention to what they are seeing, rather than my own sparring. And I get hit a lot more than I should in those situations because I sit in that middle position too much. And I'm getting slower on my changes and less able to change levels as my knees get worse, so I can't recover from that error like I once could.
A guy with whom I used to train called it, fighting right down the other guy's gun barrel.Yeah, and I have problems there sometimes. I can get oddly linear (not even angular, just linear) when I'm sparring with someone less skilled. I think I pay too much attention to what they are seeing, rather than my own sparring. And I get hit a lot more than I should in those situations because I sit in that middle position too much. And I'm getting slower on my changes and less able to change levels as my knees get worse, so I can't recover from that error like I once could.