Chris Parker
Grandmaster
No, that's not really the way it is. As I've said a number of times, with the different approaches from the different organisations, what is "right" for one is "wrong" in another. So it becomes a matter of it being less confusing for the student themselves. Another major point is that if you are learning a particular martial art from an instructor, and you then also learn the same one from another instructor, you are basically saying to the first one that you don't think they're teaching you well enough, and is really a statement about your lack of confidence in the teacher. As martial arts are all about a connection directly from the teacher to the student, what message are you sending by saying "yeah, you're good and I like you and all, but I also want this other guy to teach me, cause he does other stuff"? Basically, you've just disqualified yourself from being part of the connection.
It's to ensure that the student learns correctly, and that the teacher is afforded the respect they deserve. Kyokushin and Shotokan are different forms of karate, not just different organisations, so that analogy isn't accurate. Here we are talking about different organisations teaching the same material. This extends to us, by the way, the way I teach would be considered "wrong" by Bujinkan standards and approaches, so if you were to join a Bujinkan school, you would be told that what you had learnt was wrong. Same if you went from Bujinkan to Genbukan (my approach is closer to the Genbukan/Jinenkan approach, for the record, but there are still a number of differences there).
This really isn't to do with money, its more based in the way martial arts have been taught in the past, and continue to be done today. For that reason, there isn't a ban on cross-training in other arts, just between the organisations. It's really nothing to do with protecting memberships or their fee structure.
It's to ensure that the student learns correctly, and that the teacher is afforded the respect they deserve. Kyokushin and Shotokan are different forms of karate, not just different organisations, so that analogy isn't accurate. Here we are talking about different organisations teaching the same material. This extends to us, by the way, the way I teach would be considered "wrong" by Bujinkan standards and approaches, so if you were to join a Bujinkan school, you would be told that what you had learnt was wrong. Same if you went from Bujinkan to Genbukan (my approach is closer to the Genbukan/Jinenkan approach, for the record, but there are still a number of differences there).
This really isn't to do with money, its more based in the way martial arts have been taught in the past, and continue to be done today. For that reason, there isn't a ban on cross-training in other arts, just between the organisations. It's really nothing to do with protecting memberships or their fee structure.