P
PeachMonkey
Guest
This is great stuff, really.
As a liberal with an open socialist agenda for America, I can tell you that the Democratic Party in no way fulfills my desires for a social democracy.
Can you provide examples of members of the US Communist Party taking over the Democratic Party?
...and you can have them.
Well, I'm extremely responsible and I'm for homosexual marriage, so no, it's not that "plain and simple".
As with most issues, you are mischaracterizing this one. Ever heard of "checks and balances"? The Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled on the constitutionality of a gay marriage ban, as is their duty.
If they shouldn't be able to declare laws unconstitutional, what exactly is their role?
And more importantly, what on *earth* does this have to do with the topic of the thread?
Patrick Skerry said:the American Democratic Party today is composed of members of the defunct American Communist Party, left-wing special interest groups, and liberals with an open socialist agenda for America.
As a liberal with an open socialist agenda for America, I can tell you that the Democratic Party in no way fulfills my desires for a social democracy.
Can you provide examples of members of the US Communist Party taking over the Democratic Party?
Patrick Skerry said:The majority of conservative 'Tip O'Neil' democrats fled to the republican party over 12 years ago.
...and you can have them.
Patrick Skerry said:No responsible voter in Massachusetts will vote for homosexual marriage, it is that plain and simple.
Well, I'm extremely responsible and I'm for homosexual marriage, so no, it's not that "plain and simple".
Patrick Skerry said:The judges broke the law with their court order on homosexual marriages by violating the Seperation of Powers act because they do not have the right to ignore the vote of our lawfully elected representatives in the state house who voted against homosexual marriages.
As with most issues, you are mischaracterizing this one. Ever heard of "checks and balances"? The Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled on the constitutionality of a gay marriage ban, as is their duty.
If they shouldn't be able to declare laws unconstitutional, what exactly is their role?
And more importantly, what on *earth* does this have to do with the topic of the thread?