Nimravus said:
My totally unqualified, unsupported and unfounded assumption is this: if someone who started training this year were to immediately try to copy the Japanese shihan the way they move today, ten years from now, his taijutsu would look less like the Japanese than if he had taken the time to acquire the skills necessary to elaborate on and/or copy their movements correctly.
Obviously, as a Japan Elitist, I feel differently. :supcool:
I think that you are thinking of just going through the higher level stuff with the Japanese shihan. That is not what I am saying. While working out with them, they have often pointed out problems I have due to flawed basics passed on to me by my old American instructor (i.e. "The Evil One.") They show me how using the basics correctly help make the advanced stuff work as it is supposed to.
The thing is, the basics I had/have pass muster outside of Japan. Based on my observarions, I would say that only about three percent or (probably) less of people teaching have all the skills in the
Tenchijin to a somewhat decent level. I know I am not going to make friends by saying that.
So, I have to wonder aloud if your teachers really do know the kihon happo and are able to integrate what they learned with what is being shown in Japan now.
As I said, I look at people from all over the world training here in Japan and they do not look like what the Japanese teachers are doing. I can see where they think that taking things like
Osoto-gari from judo is close enough for taijutsu. Some of them have used be to ask, beg even, the Japanese to show them the very basics and assume they know nothing. In ten years, I can count those types on one hand. Most often, the Japanese don't bother to correct these mistakes if people don't seem to be trying to do EXACTLY what they were showing.
I think the greatest influence on the Bujinkan overseas is from people like the Evil One, who I know is very active right now in making money off of Gyokko ryu even though he does not seem to have been to Japan this year, or more than a week the last year it was taught. He teaches things that he claims are Bujinkan basics, but really are taken from things like aikido, judo or other arts like the subject of this thread is about, or from videos and books filtered through his experiences in other arts and not actual Bujinkan instruction.
He is very influential, and he is not the only one who has taught a lot of Bujinkan stuff while actually being more influenced by other arts.
That is why I say that you should not try to learn other arts too early and that you should go to the Japanese shihan to train, begging them to show you the basics to make sure you are doing a Bujinkan technique rather than one borrowed from another martial art.
I honestly think more people should be questioning their basics than trying to learn basics from other arts.