Nah, thats cool, most agree with that for the boxing ring.
How about Octagon? or the street?
Octagon against Ali? Same result. Ali's ability to kick in a fight is as well documented as Lee's ability to do anything at all in a fight. Might be worse than in the boxing ring for Lee.
Against Ali outside of the ring? Bare knuckle? Lee is dead in half a round, and that is being generous.
There is no logic or rational thought in giving the nod to Lee. Only fanboyism.
Quite frankly, it is insulting to Ali to even make the comparison. Ali was a professional fighter. Lee was a B-movie actor and the equivalent of a second dan student who ran off to do his own thing. No fight record and no documented "street fights" to support his puffed up legend.
Keep in mind that Lee died in his relative prime and that is the way that we think of him. On the other hand, we have seen Ali age and decline, first as a fighter, then on a personal level. Lee's image will never endure him aging and losing his athletic prowess. The early death combined with Lee's larger than life movie persona served to create a legend, while Ali's real life record and personal struggles must stand on their own with no help from a movie career or an early death.
Also, it is in a way insulting to Lee. Every time these questions are posed (Lee vs. fill in the blank), they always pit Lee against guys with fight records who do or did nothing but fight.
Lee was not a professional fighter and I seriously doubt that he spent much time, if any, in street fights. That is not to say that he didn't ever fight or defend himself effectively, but he wasn't out there picking fights in the bar. I have been in fights and have defended myself effectively. I do not consider myself a street fighter and would never think of fantasy matching myself against a pro fighter, or even an amateur fighter.
These scenarios completely ignore Lee's accomplishments, and the were many.
For starters, Lee opened up martial arts themed movies to a mainstream audience. Lee was like the Elvis Presley of MA movies. Were there MA movies before Lee? Sure. But they were not widely viewed or accepted in mainstream culture. Lee made that possible. The same way that Presley made rock and roll acceptable in mainstream culture. No Elvis as a commercially viable act, no Beatles as a commercially viable act. Likewise, no Lee movies, no Li movies.
Lee had the uncanny gift of being able to distill the principles of martial technique into their essence and develop a means of teaching others to apply them in a way that was most suitable for
them. Some people are much better suited to soft, circular stuff and others better suited to hard, linear stuff. Some are natural strikers, others natural grapplers. Lee recognized that.
And the results speak for themselves. JKD as a system has been proven effective by people who have learned it and applied to what they did and then made use of it, either in competition or in SD. If it was lame and pathetic, it would have died out. Lee was an innovator and he was good at seeing things for what they were and not for what they were presented as. In other words, he saw various kicks, punches, blocks, and ways of moving rather than 'Wing Chun' or 'Karate' or 'Boxing.' This definitely set the stage for modern MMA, but also changed the way that martial arts could be taught.
Lee's accomplishments should not be diminished by reducing him to a comic character in a fanboy versus argument. Ali's accomplishments should not be diminished by being fantasy matched against people who are neither professional nor amateur fighters (Ali was successful as both).
There is nothing wrong with fantasy match ups. They are a lot of fun and can get us thinking about the people in question in a different light. But matching Lee against Ali is like doing a fantasy match between the Saints and the top rugby team. Both sets of players are tough guys, but the game they play is very different.
If you really want to make a good comparison for Lee and Ali, try this:
Lee vs. Steven Seagal and Ali vs. Dolph Lundgren.
Daniel