A noble sentiment, I thought you had "retired" somewhat from this forum. Glad you have not.
Albeit I agree with the content of what you stated, in theory, I do think everyone is entitled to an opinion ... and the right to express it. I also get tired of the same detractors criticizing instead of "adding to" the discussion. To their credit, and to be generous, I bet that they think they are helping others with their perspective ... and never the twain shall meet (unless you agree with them on a point.)
How about a "Kenpo Synthesis" thread, or "Kenpo/BJJ", or maybe a "For Kenpo Street Fighters Only." They will never see, and if they do, admit, that there are merits to studying an Art, which includes Basics, Forms, Sets, Freestyle, 154 (at least) if not 256 Self-Defense techniques. Put 'em in front of someone and they want to BANG. Well so do I ... but that does not preclude my study of the complete Art and System of Kenpo as SGM Parker handed it on. This is NOT a stagnant system, it did not "freeze" with Mr. Parker's death. But what he did do, is provide us with a framework, and conceptual basis for analyzation of what is and is not USLESS. Don't you think he would have eliminated a training horse or basics from the system if he did not see value? I think he would have!!! I see the value, just because you can't does not mean, "Your opinion is correct."
He trained basics in isolation, out of a horse ... he also did them out of a neutral bow. This same rationale applies to techniques. He did all the techniques ... not just a limited number, and boy did he explode and rip!!!!!!
Just because YOU cannot, will not, or do not learn all the techniques, mean anything to me. I have learned them, used them (or pieces of them) and given the 24 years I have been at Kenpo ... not just in it, consider all the techniques as valuable and necessary.
Yes, I could make do with 20 or 30 to defend myself, but that is not the complete goal in understanding or executing the sophisticated system that we all study. The techniques give us a vehicle for finding applications, from any possible position in which we may find ourselves. Try it with anyone in the Art over 20 years, and I bet they will use a piece of a technique whether seated, laying down or standing on their heads . Heck, you don't have to be at it 20 years, I just wanted you to have some perspective, and realize some of the Seniors do read this Board, they don't comment on the forum, but in private, the shake their heads, laugh, and say "they just don't get it". :rofl:
Those who want to train, TRAIN. Those who don't, DON'T. But do not impose your limitations or bias convinces Newby's who don't know whether they have ever been exposed to GOOD KENPO, or not.
That is my pet peeve.
I am getting off the :soapbox: now.
Albeit I agree with the content of what you stated, in theory, I do think everyone is entitled to an opinion ... and the right to express it. I also get tired of the same detractors criticizing instead of "adding to" the discussion. To their credit, and to be generous, I bet that they think they are helping others with their perspective ... and never the twain shall meet (unless you agree with them on a point.)
How about a "Kenpo Synthesis" thread, or "Kenpo/BJJ", or maybe a "For Kenpo Street Fighters Only." They will never see, and if they do, admit, that there are merits to studying an Art, which includes Basics, Forms, Sets, Freestyle, 154 (at least) if not 256 Self-Defense techniques. Put 'em in front of someone and they want to BANG. Well so do I ... but that does not preclude my study of the complete Art and System of Kenpo as SGM Parker handed it on. This is NOT a stagnant system, it did not "freeze" with Mr. Parker's death. But what he did do, is provide us with a framework, and conceptual basis for analyzation of what is and is not USLESS. Don't you think he would have eliminated a training horse or basics from the system if he did not see value? I think he would have!!! I see the value, just because you can't does not mean, "Your opinion is correct."
He trained basics in isolation, out of a horse ... he also did them out of a neutral bow. This same rationale applies to techniques. He did all the techniques ... not just a limited number, and boy did he explode and rip!!!!!!
Just because YOU cannot, will not, or do not learn all the techniques, mean anything to me. I have learned them, used them (or pieces of them) and given the 24 years I have been at Kenpo ... not just in it, consider all the techniques as valuable and necessary.
Yes, I could make do with 20 or 30 to defend myself, but that is not the complete goal in understanding or executing the sophisticated system that we all study. The techniques give us a vehicle for finding applications, from any possible position in which we may find ourselves. Try it with anyone in the Art over 20 years, and I bet they will use a piece of a technique whether seated, laying down or standing on their heads . Heck, you don't have to be at it 20 years, I just wanted you to have some perspective, and realize some of the Seniors do read this Board, they don't comment on the forum, but in private, the shake their heads, laugh, and say "they just don't get it". :rofl:
Those who want to train, TRAIN. Those who don't, DON'T. But do not impose your limitations or bias convinces Newby's who don't know whether they have ever been exposed to GOOD KENPO, or not.
That is my pet peeve.
I am getting off the :soapbox: now.