jobo
Grandmaster
yes but particularly effective against bjjPretty sure having your spine lacerated is a counter to most defensive techniques up to and including shooting people.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yes but particularly effective against bjjPretty sure having your spine lacerated is a counter to most defensive techniques up to and including shooting people.
You completely missed the point. Again.its a good argument round here, because its like that. Real world fight have weapons,
Mma training prepares you for mma, which is a pretty close aproximation of 1 v 1 fighting, and I dare say prepares you for your multiple/armed scenario as much as anything else will, aside from maybe a firearms course.
Now this isn't because those systems..mostly mt boxing and BJJ are the only viable systems..because I don't believe that at all. It's because they train for the job they intend to do.
The guy who actually fought someone. MMA is training for the real world to the level you can realistically expect one person to achieve.
The fantasy is the expectation that training for the real world includes training to handle 5 guys.
Why would you think any training should be expected to handle that?
yes, and your insistance that arts / schools that don't do live fighting are no good for self defence. When that is totally dependent on who is attacking you and what withI said schools, not arts. While not all arts, or styles, are equally viable, more important is how they are trained.
yes but particularly effective against bjj
Hello, wall.yes, and your insistance that arts / schools that don't do live fighting are no good for self defence. When that is totally dependent on who is attacking you and what with
why would it be different, besides from the fact that you probably won't be trying to take an ak 47 off them, unless its LA obviouslyIt's at this point where I wish I knew how the different armed forces around the world trained. I know for example that some train in Krav Maga but I'm guessing there is a big difference between the Krav Maga that is taught to civilians and that which is taught to the armed forces.
very difficult to do unless they turn their back on youNo. Pretty sure spine laceration is particularly effective against any style.
Yeah kicks like that are no good. If the kick has no effect on the opponents efforts then it's worthless. I should never feel as if I can just walk through attacks and have little care if it hits me or not. Strikes have enough force where I really can't afford them to land unchallengedAnd some techniques are better full contact. Like head kicks which are pretty useless if you can brush them off with one hand.
your arguments don't make any,sense outside your own head.Hello, wall.
It's at this point where I wish I knew how the different armed forces around the world trained. I know for example that some train in Krav Maga but I'm guessing there is a big difference between the Krav Maga that is taught to civilians and that which is taught to the armed forces.
No no, the inexperienced person/person with no applicable training is somehow more likely to have and know how to use a weapon than someone that does have training(don't ask why! Just because!) therefore doing katas and chi sau is twice as effective as doing anything that resembles combat training if you want to beat up 5 armed attackers at once. Duh, don't you know anything? Logic man! I know it's true because I beat up a kid once when I was 10!No. Pretty sure spine laceration is particularly effective against any style.
very difficult to do unless they turn their back on you
that realy wasn't my point, but seems as you raise it, doing drills that involve your opponent have a weapon, gives you a better skill set, than doing mma with no weapons drillNo no, the inexperienced person/person with no applicable training is somehow more likely to have and know how to use a weapon than someone that does have training(don't ask why! Just because!) therefore doing katas and chi sau is twice as effective as doing anything that resembles combat training if you want to beat up 5 armed attackers at once. Duh, don't you know anything? Logic man!
The white guy has set himself up for a hip throw. Lucky it's boxingNo i can just reach over their shoulder. Basically any clinch.
that why you fight a distance if they are swinging a broken bottle about, but you cant do bbj at distance can you. That's a beeek problemNo i can just reach over their shoulder. Basically any clinch.
I forgot that everything is in the kata.No no, the inexperienced person/person with no applicable training is somehow more likely to have and know how to use a weapon than someone that does have training(don't ask why! Just because!) therefore doing katas and chi sau is twice as effective as doing anything that resembles combat training if you want to beat up 5 armed attackers at once. Duh, don't you know anything? Logic man! I know it's true because I beat up a kid once when I was 10!
that why you fight a distance if they are swinging a broken bottle about, but you cant do bbj at distance can you. That's a beeek problem
The white guy has set himself up for a hip throw. Lucky it's boxing