now disabled
Master Black Belt
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2018
- Messages
- 1,443
- Reaction score
- 200
Would you not need to be a shodan or higher yourself to know this?
Ummm yes lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Would you not need to be a shodan or higher yourself to know this?
imo until you reach there you will not fully fully start getting the nuances etc and the things that well get left out or indeed you won't need as before that it unlikely in the Aikikai anyway that anyone will come at you at full force as up till then your grinding out the kihon waza the basics ....
I agree with that. I think I've seen some that didn't (probably Ki Society affiliates), but it's rare.I really have yet to find an Aikido school that doesn't prominently advertise self defense.
But didn't you say in a different thread and I quote, you only ever attained a "lower rank"?Ummm yes lol
Would you not need to be a shodan or higher yourself to know this?
People place their kids into boxing and wrestling programs almost exclusively for competitive purposes. People walking into an Aikido dojo are looking for a system of self defense that will protect them. I'm fully aware that there are those who also learn Aikido for spiritual purposes, but we would be lying to ourselves if we believed that the majority of people taking Aikido weren't doing it for martial purposes.
I agree with that. I think I've seen some that didn't (probably Ki Society affiliates), but it's rare.
I think it's more accurate to say that it takes a long time to learn to put aiki principles into practice. So, for a brand new student (no useful background) they will spend years slowly building reactions, timing, and principles until they can put them together usefully. If they aren't learning basic fighting skills, I'd double the time it takes to get to "useful", since they have to use aiki principles where they are not optimal, and that requires more skill development.So you don't start to really learn Aikido until black belt?
But didn't you say in a different thread and I quote, you only ever attained a "lower rank"?
Most Aikidoka would consider shodan a "lower rank", probably even nidan and maybe sandan.But didn't you say in a different thread and I quote, you only ever attained a "lower rank"?
I think it's more accurate to say that it takes a long time to learn to put aiki principles into practice. So, for a brand new student (no useful background) they will spend years slowly building reactions, timing, and principles until they can put them together usefully. If they aren't learning basic fighting skills, I'd double the time it takes to get to "useful", since they have to use aiki principles where they are not optimal, and that requires more skill development.
In my opinion, it's not so much that the teaching methodology is inefficient, but that they're depending upon aiki principles and techniques to cover everything. It's an inefficient approach to developing fighting skill, but it might still be as efficient an approach as you can get to actually developing that aiki skill.Wouldn't that be an indication of an inefficient teaching methodology if you're spending years just getting to the point where you can use the techniques on a basic level?
Just for a point of comparison, I was implementing Kimuras and Guillotine chokes on resisting opponents about 3 months into Bjj.
Most Aikidoka would consider shodan a "lower rank", probably even nidan and maybe sandan.
In my opinion, it's not so much that the teaching methodology is inefficient, but that they're depending upon aiki principles and techniques to cover everything. It's an inefficient approach to developing fighting skill, but it might still be as efficient an approach as you can get to actually developing that aiki skill.
i havnt been able to read all the responses yet so forgive me if this has been touched upon.
i think what we are seeing is a split between different views on Aikido. i personally see aikido in a way that was not meant to be effective for self defense. to me it is very much like other arts, kyodo, shodo or Japanese tea ceremony. you dont practice it in order to compare it to a triple, venti, half sweet, non fat, caramel macchiato. which is exactly what people are trying to do by comparing Aikido with MMA.
so there is a growing division between the self defense proponents and the people who dont care about that aspect. i think eventually we will see the split large enough for the new defense art to have its own name....tactical Aiki or some such thing.
So you don't start to really learn Aikido until black belt?
If this is the case, then why do Aikidoka state that Aikido is ineffective against trained fighters?
Oh we going to go to the Tenshin now are we
well before you start on that ...he was the real deal in Aikido ....he ain't now and yes his claims are somewhat suss but in Aikido he does hold the ran he claims all be it he didn't get it exactly when he claimed lol