Originally posted by Kodanjaclay
For example, in the Kukkiwon textbook there is a reference to Taekwondo in the ancient past. we know this to be an impossibility based on the facts of the Japanese occupation of WWII and its impact on Sino and Korean society. Does it make more sense now?
Sir, I have always believed that Taekwondo is a hybrid martial art but with ancient origins. According to various sources including the USOC's TKD wing and yes the Kukkiwon, I've learned as much.
To paraphrase, "Taekwondo is a traditional Korean martial artĀ
Its origins are not well known but three possibilities are often described. One traces taekwondo to Korea's three-kingdom era (ca. 50 BC) when Silla Dynasty warriors, the Hwarang, began to develop a martial art, tae kyon ("foot-hand"). Others feel that taekwondo began as a form of Chinese boxing, which was established at the Shaolin Temple in 520 BC by Bodhidharma, the founder of Zen Buddhism. A third possibility is that taekwondo developed from Japanese or Okinawan karate. It is now felt that taekwondo probably developed from other Asian martial arts combined with traditional Korean techniques of kickboxing."
I'm certain you've heard and read much of this same type of information. All of this appears to be true. In any event, from the research I've done on my art, which may be flawed, sure I do realize that Taekwondo is relatively new, just having been officially born in the mid 1950's. In any event, from everything I've read it cannot be denied that TKD does have historical, ancient origins. IMHO, to deny as much would be an injustice to TKD. This issue is much like Bruce Lee's Jeet Kune Do, which is also relatively new, however, the art itself traces its origins back many, many years. Moreover, like TKD, JKD it is an amalgam of many differing styles.
So can they be called historical MAs? Well that depends on your interpretation on what is a historical MA.
Just My Take... :asian: