and not interested in politics.
Doesn't sound like you aren't.
Let's just accept that guns are ubiquitous and exceedingly easy for anyone who wants one to legally acquire. That is reality.
Not really. I didn't have to go through a background check when I bought my last car. I did when I bought my last gun.
So, what is to be done?
Bullet proof backpacks? Might help in an emergency, but may also have long term emotional or mental impacts on kids.
Considering a "bulletproof backpack" for you kid? We put them to the test.
www.king5.com
Long term emotional impact? The same way that wearing a helmet when biking or seatbelts when in cars causes long term mental impact. You know what kind of long term impact it will have? On their backs. Backbacks are already so heavy that their use is causing back and hip problems. Level IV rated plates aren't particularly light and are comparatively bulky. Adding the extra weight to something already over-weight is just going to lead to people not using the product.
Experts say a studentās backpack should only be 10 percent of the youngsterās body weight. Here are some other tips on how to lessen the load your child carries.
www.healthline.com
Arm the teachers? Though in Uvalde, the armed staffer didn't stop the bad guy from entering the school.
That was one resource officer to the 600 student population. And, apparently, like the rest of the Uvalde Police Force, he didn't actually do his job.
Credible opinions on this are mixed (being very generous)
The survey, conducted by Texas American Federation of Teachers, comes two weeks after the Uvalde school shooting as Republicans call for more school employees to be armed.
www.texastribune.org
They have a political agenda to push. The real way to tell if it's wanted or not is to see how many teachers volunteer for the training when they are given the option. Turns out that, depending on where and when, somewhere between 30 and 50% volunteer and most have to be turned away due to lack of resources; this from actual school training organizations FASTER Colorado and FASTER Ohio.
You can easily find other surveys which find the opposite.
Be careful about trusting "surveys."
Hire more cops to guard the entrances?
Since the 1900s, U.S. public schools have employed a growing number of school resource officers (SROs) ā defined here as sworn law enforcement officials. In ...
education.uconn.edu
So let's quote from this article:
"What is the impact of SROs on studentsā safety in schools? SROs are categorically police officers and, as such, their prevalence in schools raises questions regarding the safety of children, especially children of color, children living in poverty, and immigrant children. Decades of evidence demonstrates racial and ethnic disparities in policing. Black and Latine[xlviii] communities (youth and adults) are disproportionately subject to pedestrian and vehicle stops, citations, searches, arrests, and incarceration.[xlix] In addition to the rate of police contact, the nature of police contact harms communities of color. Incidents of police violence disproportionately impact Black individuals, who are 2.3 to 5 times more likely to be killed by police than whites.[l] Native and Latine populations are also at higher risk of being killed by police.[li]"
Ah. Cops are, by nature, racist.
Send kids to mandatory krav maga classes?
Might be good for them but I doubt it would be helpful in what you are wanting to address.
What do we do? Before Columbine most schools had multiple, unguarded, unlocked entrance points where pretty much anybody who wanted to could just walk in. We learned that we needed restricted points of entry.
Before Columbine, it was assumed that armed people in a place were there for a hostage standoff so the default tactic was to go into siege mode. After, we learned that the best tactic is for the very first officer on scene, even if it was just one cop with no body armor, including the SRO, to go hunt down the armed murderer, even if it meant the cop might be in danger, because, at the very worst, it takes the murderer's attention of off their preferred victim and usually ends the attack completely.
We learned that when a troubled person makes multiple threats to attack a school to not ignore it and pretend it'll be OK.
So what do we do? We stop ignoring the lessons we've known for 30 years. We don't allow a teacher to prop open a back door so that she can go get a smoke between classes, allowing a twisted murderer to ignore ingress points. We tell SRO's that they actually do need to confront an active killer and the responding cops that they don't get to stand around outside for 75 minutes because they're afraid they might get shot at and, instead, tazing and handcuffing parents. When a troubled person makes repeated overtures that they want to attack a school, we take it seriously and don't ignore it.
Basically, we already know what to do, they just didn't do any of it in Uvalde.