oftheherd1
Senior Master
Someone just did invent this. Free to schools too. App for smart phones.
Smart Safety for Organizations - Mayday Safety
Peace favor your sword,
Kirk
That might have possibilities. Thanks for the link.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Someone just did invent this. Free to schools too. App for smart phones.
Smart Safety for Organizations - Mayday Safety
Peace favor your sword,
Kirk
Just going by evidence-driven statistics of "what actually works."I appreciate the article @lklawson . In the article, the emphasis seems to be simply to move to cover... with the coda of "return fire." Are you saying that there is no real training that would benefit a teenager? Running, and looking for cover seems very sensible, and I've seen many articles recently that discuss a shift from the "lockdown" mentality to more of a "get the hell out fast" one.
Not the students, per se, but as a part of a wholistic game-plan. Again, from an evidence-driven research paradigm:But I don't know that this would require a lot of training. Returning fire doesn't seem practical or advisable.
Honestly? That's it. Unarmed against a person with a gun, these are the most effective strategies.If you guys were going to create a "self defense" course for teenagers with the goal of reducing their risk in an active shooter situation, what else might you include beyond the above?
Hard to avoid politics because it is such a politicized topic.Also, to clarify, in an effort to avoid the politics, I suggest we consider schools as they are and focus on things the kids can do for themselves. If we get into other things, such as school planning/construction, arming teachers, or changing gun laws, this will surely stray into politics.
Most of these "school shooters" were reported. The douchbag in Florida was reported multiple times. The FBI already had a warning as said douchbag wrote online what his plans were and an observer reported it. The local police went to the douchebag's home dozens of times.The only thing I could ask kids to do is...if you hear or see something report it.
While I agree that trauma care is different for a gunshot the point of the original statement wasn't about what to do for a gunshot but what would be a better use of time and resources for the students calling for gun control. Their time would be more effectively used and more people would be saved, statistically speaking, if they spent their time learning CPR instead of the time they spend promoting gun control laws.Firstly, that guy recommending CPR - it's painfully obvious that he knows less about trauma first aid than I know about interpretive dance.
I suppose there are worse things than CPR you could do to a gunshot victim, like you could shoot them again, or maybe stab them...
Depends on the teenager. I worked with one 13 year old boy who was already 160 and 5'7". He has just as much physicality as most adults.In reality, there is no 'self defence' a teenager can effect against a determined armed attacker, and the suggestion gets even more preposterous as the age goes down. They're not exactly going to stand up and de-escalate the situation, and what physical option does a 12/13 year old have against someone armed (with anything from a hammer to a rifle)?
Without commenting on the political aspect, my take on it was this politician was saying that the students calling for gun control are wasting their time and their time would be better spent learning CPR. I'm deliberately trying to avoid commenting on whether or not I agree with the statement.To suggest teaching "CPR" is hugely misinformed, but it's making the political statement that "hey, these things are going to happen, let's give the victims something to do after".
While I agree that trauma care is different for a gunshot the point of the original statement wasn't about what to do for a gunshot but what would be a better use of time and resources for the students calling for gun control. Their time would be more effectively used and more people would be saved, statistically speaking, if they spent their time learning CPR instead of the time they spend promoting gun control laws.
That said, a basic First Aid course which covers CPR and Trauma would be a great idea for almost everyone.
Did you click through to my article?The phrase "duck and cover" springs to mind.
Without commenting on the political aspect, my take on it was this politician was saying that the students calling for gun control are wasting their time and their time would be better spent learning CPR. I'm deliberately trying to avoid commenting on whether or not I agree with the statement
First Aid, really Trauma Care, is what you do after the shooting. I recall seeing some statistics which suggest that 50% or more of deaths from gunshots in these sort of events could have been prevented with proper application of tourniquets and chest seals. The idea isn't to be a combat medic, just to keep the injured "in the game" until a higher level of care can get there.you shouldn't really have to learn first aid, from my thinking. Either the situation has been fixed in which case the professionals should be there in seconds, or it hasn't in which case it would be risky going to the other child to administer first aid.
Not even that. Statistics show that mass school shootings aren't any more numerous now than in the past. In fact, they may be a tad lower depending one which statistical collection method you prefer. They're not more common but they are much more blasted out in the news.We did not used to have a real problem with firearms in the US either.
I did not write that. Please do not play that game.So effectively you're agreeing that this sort of incident is inevitable so there's no point trying to stop them happening in the first place, better just learn to mop up after?
What I believe is the actual cause is outside of the bounds of the subject of this thread.While it's a waste of time to campaign for half hearted laws that don't do much, if anything, would it not be better to recommend spending that time on identifying and fixing the actual cause?
I'm not sure that you know what my reasons are and I'm sure that I don't know what yours are. And, at the moment, I'm still a little cheezed at you so I'm going to refrain from speculation.That much I agree with, everyone should know first aid - but I feel my reasons for that are somewhat different to yours...
Look, stop trying to take this thread political.Try as you might, there is (apparently) no way to escape the political side of it.
Of course it is. I've written that 5 times now. I've also written repeatedly that I am avoiding commenting on the veracity of that statement. And, in this thread, I recommend you do the same. MT has rules about politics.Saying people are wasting their time campaigning and lobbying is in itself a political statement, as is supporting a proposal to introduce policies about what they should do instead.
I haven't had a chance to read it yet, but this might be useful:What does "effective self defense" look like in American schools these days?
Do you mean in the time between the shooting stops, and the professional gets there?First Aid, really Trauma Care, is what you do after the shooting. I recall seeing some statistics which suggest that 50% or more of deaths from gunshots in these sort of events could have been prevented with proper application of tourniquets and chest seals. The idea isn't to be a combat medic, just to keep the injured "in the game" until a higher level of care can get there.
Peace favor your sword,
Kirk
That said, a basic First Aid course which covers CPR and Trauma would be a great idea for almost everyone.
Peace favor your sword,
Kirk
Not even that. Statistics show that mass school shootings aren't any more numerous now than in the past. In fact, they may be a tad lower depending one which statistical collection method you prefer. They're not more common but they are much more blasted out in the news.
https://www.quora.com/How-can-we-stop-the-school-shootings
Peace favor your sword,
Kirk
Stats on CPR aren't all that encouraging. The gist of what I've read on the subject indicates that it's not often used, and seldom effective even when someone receives it. Better than nothing, though, I guess.Ignoring everything else on the topic, this sounds like a good idea in general. Schools teach CPR, but with all the different ways someone can get injured, a basic first aid/first responder course could be very useful. I learned/taught that stuff for BSA, and have had to use the knowledge from it a bunch of times (in and out of scouts). Never for anything big, but just basic knowledge that makes life easier when someone gets hurt.