The 4 ranges of Kenpo:
1. Out of Range
2. Contact Range (most tournament sparrers)
3. Contact Penetration Range (Think Boxers)
4. Contact Manipulation Range (Analogous to a Japanese or Wally Jay Small Circle range)
Doc's SL-4 is the range inside the Contact Manipulation Range. Ed Parker Jr. has some interesting insights or stories regarding how the name was derived; but regardless of what it is called, Doc can thump.
At some level the Kenpo Practitioner learns to relax, center, breath/body unite, and in the more Chinese derived Kenpo offshoots, QiJong or breath, energy, body integration is taught.
I personally feel the silk reeling or reeling silk energy and a whipping power in my art, but also studied Pa-Qua when it was still spelled that way and had a passing interest in Tai Chi and Hsing-I. Note: I do know the more modern or "accurate" spelling, but do not want to misrepresent when or in what I was training.
Now, as to Kenpo and Tai Chi, I respectfully disagree with Doc. I can't fault his credentials or what he does. It works, and takes advantage of a different genre of material than most Kenpo practitioners utilize, or that it uses a different paradigm to teach. But I do not feel or see the similarities to Taiji Chuan (or as I was doing Tai Chi Chuan Fa ... same thing I think.)
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but until I, or you experience what Doc does, I cannot judge the similarities or differences. Maybe one of you on the West Coast could "audit" a class, since it is a university based model? By the same token, Doc, you can't just say they are the same and let it go leaving it to your word, especially when addressing a bunch of "subject matter experts" in the other field. Come on - give a little.
Respectfully,
-Michael
Kenpo-Texas.com
1. Out of Range
2. Contact Range (most tournament sparrers)
3. Contact Penetration Range (Think Boxers)
4. Contact Manipulation Range (Analogous to a Japanese or Wally Jay Small Circle range)
Doc's SL-4 is the range inside the Contact Manipulation Range. Ed Parker Jr. has some interesting insights or stories regarding how the name was derived; but regardless of what it is called, Doc can thump.
At some level the Kenpo Practitioner learns to relax, center, breath/body unite, and in the more Chinese derived Kenpo offshoots, QiJong or breath, energy, body integration is taught.
I personally feel the silk reeling or reeling silk energy and a whipping power in my art, but also studied Pa-Qua when it was still spelled that way and had a passing interest in Tai Chi and Hsing-I. Note: I do know the more modern or "accurate" spelling, but do not want to misrepresent when or in what I was training.
Now, as to Kenpo and Tai Chi, I respectfully disagree with Doc. I can't fault his credentials or what he does. It works, and takes advantage of a different genre of material than most Kenpo practitioners utilize, or that it uses a different paradigm to teach. But I do not feel or see the similarities to Taiji Chuan (or as I was doing Tai Chi Chuan Fa ... same thing I think.)
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but until I, or you experience what Doc does, I cannot judge the similarities or differences. Maybe one of you on the West Coast could "audit" a class, since it is a university based model? By the same token, Doc, you can't just say they are the same and let it go leaving it to your word, especially when addressing a bunch of "subject matter experts" in the other field. Come on - give a little.
Respectfully,
-Michael
Kenpo-Texas.com