dancingalone
Grandmaster
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2007
- Messages
- 5,322
- Reaction score
- 281
I always find it interesting that people use hindsight reasoning to say why Kano/Mifune were the exceptions and make excuses. Some on the thread did add in clarifiers about being a prodigy and so forth so this observation doesn't apply to them, but many do not and will backpedal when they find out it was Kano.
I am sceptical of high ranking youngsters viewed through the lens of the HERE and NOW. I don't particularly care how things were done over a century ago by Kano in another country with very different living conditions from what I live in now myself. That fact is that arts like judo or karate or aikido have built up a body of expectations and customs over the years since they were founded. I would haphazard to say that most of these are good ones, such as the practice of allowing reasonable time to pass before promoting a student to a higher rank, thus making young 7th dans an unlikely or impossible occurrence.
So pointing out that Kano or Ueshiba or Shimabukuro did it really doesn't mean much to me. All of their respective arts have moved on since their founding and we know in judo and aikido, you simply won't get a 21 year 6th dan. Not from a legitimate organization anyway.