I find this interested thread. What's your opinion on this?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I didn't think there was much "borderline" about it. What's the rule cutoff on a slam?The BJJ guys mistake was to continue standing back up. The wrestler was stalling and avoiding engaging in the match. Once the BJJ was on the mat he didn't need to stand back up. At that point the onus is on the wrestler to engage.
That was also a borderline slam and he could have been dq'd.
Who is avoiding the fight?The BJJ guys mistake was to continue standing back up. The wrestler was stalling and avoiding engaging in the match. Once the BJJ was on the mat he didn't need to stand back up. At that point the onus is on the wrestler to engage.
That was also a borderline slam and he could have been dq'd.
"What's the value of your ground skill if you can't even take your opponent down?" Another way to ask this question can be "What's the value of your take down skill if you can't control your opponent on the ground?"Know both if you are going to do both.
This remind me a Chinese wrestling match that I had in Taiwan. My opponent used his right hand to grab on my front belt. I used my left forearm to under hook and strike on his right elbow joint. Some audience was yielding that I had used excessive force.That was also a borderline slam and he could have been dq'd.
sometimes, it's a judgment call. In cases like this, at least in a few of the take downs, they are well executed, even if they are high amplitude. Some, though, where he sort of picks the guy up and them drops him.. that's where it crosses over, imo.I didn't think there was much "borderline" about it. What's the rule cutoff on a slam?
in agrappling match, depends on the rules, of course. But if a guy is on the ground, stands up from guard and doesn't re-engage, that's a serious foul. It's also considered a serious foul if you avoid combat when I'm on the ground and you don't close and engage. You can be penalized and eventually dq'd for either in IBJJF tournaments.Who is avoiding the fight?
- Does the BJJ guy avoid the wrestling, or
- does the wrestler avoid the ground game?
In a MMA match between a boxer and a grappler, it's common to see that the boxer tries to avoid the grappling game, and the grappler tries to avoid the boxing game. IMO, the ending will decides who is the winner, not the strategy to get there.
I'm a little bit confused here. Please tell me what's wrong with my following logic.But if a guy is on the ground, stands up from guard and doesn't re-engage, that's a serious foul.
The BJJ guys mistake was to continue standing back up. The wrestler was stalling and avoiding engaging in the match. Once the BJJ was on the mat he didn't need to stand back up. At that point the onus is on the wrestler to engage.
That was also a borderline slam and he could have been dq'd.
Depends on if it's a ground fighting competition or not. If I'm waiting for you to engage and fight me, and you do not, you are fleeing combat. In mma, the rules are opposite than in many grappling competitions.I'm a little bit confused here. Please tell me what's wrong with my following logic.
If your ground skill is not good enough to keep your opponent to stay on the ground, and if you allow him to get back up, that should be your problem and not his problem.
Could be, but impossible to know because as soon as he disengaged the BJJ guy consistently stood right up.I think this is the difficulty for us to analyze: we don't know what the rules or background of this match are. Was it pretty much no rules aside from no striking? Or does it have NAGA/IBJJF type rules? With the way the match went and was enforced (i.e. The ref was letting the wrestler consistently stall/disengage every time it didn't go how he wanted it to, ie to the ground and with the two slams), I'm guessing the former.
Could be, but impossible to know because as soon as he disengaged the BJJ guy consistently stood right up.
I took that as an indicator that the rules were such that staying down had no benefit. Assuming he's accustomed to BJJ competition rules, if he were playing under them he would have fairly automatically stayed down, I'd expect. He seemed to be overriding his own habits at times.Could be, but impossible to know because as soon as he disengaged the BJJ guy consistently stood right up.
Ah. That's a different view of it. I think that makes sense.I think this was a beginner division, and the wrestler just start BJJ and so signed up in hat class with the advantage of those skills but no BJJ. My gut says that these guys really didn't understand the rules, and were just doing what they knew.
I didn't think there was much "borderline" about it. What's the rule cutoff on a slam?
Depends on the context. For a real fight, I absolutely agree with you. For a sport, it depends on the rules of the sport. Most BJJ competitions have rules which require you to engage the person on the ground or be penalized for avoiding engagement. Other grappling sports have different rules. Some don't require you to engage on the ground. Some limit the time you can spend on the ground or disallow it entirely.I'm a little bit confused here. Please tell me what's wrong with my following logic.
If your ground skill is not good enough to keep your opponent to stay on the ground, and if you allow him to get back up, that should be your problem and not his problem.