infinite beginner
Purple Belt
It occurs to me as I just watched some indian martial artist
a minute ago , and they should know ,having put the ind in
indonesian, I was told thats where silat comes from,but the
point is ,once a set of principles are ingrained into the foundation
then any art that shares the same foundation of principles
is like an outside lesson in our own art,
the genius of any system is in simplifying the complex
where systems cross , in their approaches, to techniques
at that moment they are doing your art and you theirs
where the differences disappeared if point E is as they
attack to have the opponent KO on the floor, and ABC
and D ,is the method of arriving at E , that is if we were
to break the major motions down to frame by frame ,
rare is it , all the frames match identically but if they do
its like a jackpot on a slot machine ,but if enough of them
do you can fill in the blank easy enough to keep it in the
common sense understanding ,as an extension of knowledge
more than an addition to it , meaning to still be able to do
things the same old way ,only with an added trick or two,
picked up ,by watching, its like effortless if they are working
under the same principles no conversion applies ,whats the
big difference is that divides styles ,isn't what their hands
are doing once in range ,but what their feet work was to
step them off into their elbow range , however subtle
some more superior styles might suggest , the core and
heart of the art is in the footwork ,and the hands take a
backseat, that the hands are to put up an leveraging obstacle
so crucial footing can be established ,and once standing
in the same space where they're standing ,or rather
collapsing down into ,then foot stance and structure
has been achieved,like what happens when some one
nudges their shoulder into another while walking
its creates a shuddering little stumble , and a couple
of steps to regain balance,just as limbs are there for
striking ,the stance step and structure ,produce a stumble
effect only thing is their feet are trapped , so they are to
fall straight down with broken legs or darn near ,
which brings us to the sapu , some think of the sweep
as a tool to induce falling, others as something best
done after they are already falling ,the difference is
hitting the floor about ten times harder if you wanna
add in compression principles , so the only way to fall
straight down is to have no legs the only way to take
the legs is bump into them, well its the simplest anyway
just don't forget to say excuse me,the bump can also
be considered a strike ,one way I learned is to take out
the collar bone with the passing shoulder strike ,I say
learned ,cause its not as easy as it seems , in silat
everything is ingeniously converted into a weapon ,
a minute ago , and they should know ,having put the ind in
indonesian, I was told thats where silat comes from,but the
point is ,once a set of principles are ingrained into the foundation
then any art that shares the same foundation of principles
is like an outside lesson in our own art,
the genius of any system is in simplifying the complex
where systems cross , in their approaches, to techniques
at that moment they are doing your art and you theirs
where the differences disappeared if point E is as they
attack to have the opponent KO on the floor, and ABC
and D ,is the method of arriving at E , that is if we were
to break the major motions down to frame by frame ,
rare is it , all the frames match identically but if they do
its like a jackpot on a slot machine ,but if enough of them
do you can fill in the blank easy enough to keep it in the
common sense understanding ,as an extension of knowledge
more than an addition to it , meaning to still be able to do
things the same old way ,only with an added trick or two,
picked up ,by watching, its like effortless if they are working
under the same principles no conversion applies ,whats the
big difference is that divides styles ,isn't what their hands
are doing once in range ,but what their feet work was to
step them off into their elbow range , however subtle
some more superior styles might suggest , the core and
heart of the art is in the footwork ,and the hands take a
backseat, that the hands are to put up an leveraging obstacle
so crucial footing can be established ,and once standing
in the same space where they're standing ,or rather
collapsing down into ,then foot stance and structure
has been achieved,like what happens when some one
nudges their shoulder into another while walking
its creates a shuddering little stumble , and a couple
of steps to regain balance,just as limbs are there for
striking ,the stance step and structure ,produce a stumble
effect only thing is their feet are trapped , so they are to
fall straight down with broken legs or darn near ,
which brings us to the sapu , some think of the sweep
as a tool to induce falling, others as something best
done after they are already falling ,the difference is
hitting the floor about ten times harder if you wanna
add in compression principles , so the only way to fall
straight down is to have no legs the only way to take
the legs is bump into them, well its the simplest anyway
just don't forget to say excuse me,the bump can also
be considered a strike ,one way I learned is to take out
the collar bone with the passing shoulder strike ,I say
learned ,cause its not as easy as it seems , in silat
everything is ingeniously converted into a weapon ,
Last edited: