No, not any more than anyone else. Those are useful traits, of course, but we don’t focus on them in any overly special way. Martial training ought to develop them in an appropriate way, regardless.
I have seen descriptions of the “five animals” in Chinese martial arts, and folk traditions, and there can be this kind of description that ascribes certain traits to the animal. That is all well and fine on an intellectual and theoretical level but i do not believe it translates directly into the animal styles, i spite of what some folks claim. But in my experience, in my particular Crane method (Tibetan) that has no bearing. We do not do special exercises for balance or accuracy outside of our regular martial training. Like I said, we punch and kick like all the rest.
I haven’t trained in them so I cannot say for certain. But if so, not really to copy or “become” the animal. I don’t know what specific traits Tiger method uses, other than the claw hand which is not unique to that method. Certainly a human cannot move like a tiger and cannot develop the strength of a tiger. A smaller person can practice tiger, one does not need to be big and strong to do tiger. So that isn’t it.
Perhaps. But humans have developed methodologies as well as rule sets that may apply under certain circumstances. Watching animals fight can have things in common with human wrestling, but it is certainly not the same thing. When chimpanzees fight with killing intent, they bite, rip, tear, pound and smash along with that grabbing and “grappling”. It looks nothing like a BJJ match, for example, and it ranges all across the forest as the combatants move and engage and disengage and engage again.
Mm…kind of. I see what you are saying but I don’t really agree that it is the same thing.
well, I believe that in the chaos of real combat, the quality and cleanness of your technique will degrade rapidly. That is why we practice as perfectly as we can, so that when it degrades, there is still enough integrity to be effective.