MJS said:Where is this video posted that everyone is talking about??
Mike
Many videos including the one you are requesting are here. Better hurry before ?someone? has it removed.
www.geocities.com/kenpo_2000/at_the_movies.html
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
MJS said:Where is this video posted that everyone is talking about??
Mike
rmcrobertson said:Otherwise, I guess I'll just keep muddling through, thanks. I understand your concerns and motives, though, just as I did when you were expressing pretty much the same sorts of concerns and motives on behalf of the AKKI over on KenpoNet during the last two weeks.
In Defense of RobertFastmover said:Robert in your case after watching the video it is my belief that you are defying many of the principles of Kenpo taught by Mr. Parker. As I noted earlier I will reframe from sequentially listing the reasons why. But since we are discussing the developement of different systems structure, one has to wonder if there would be a better way for you to internalize proper boby mechanics throughout your vocabulary of motion. The fruits of your labor is not what I was expecting for someone of your experience.
Moving on.....as to your video being shown on the internet...personally I had been looking forward to seeing you move because I was expecting a lot after reading many of your postings on the forums. An advanced ranking black belt should not hesitate in demonstrating their abilities in front of others. It makes them accountable and keeps them from being a salesman of motion. Given that you routinely volunteer your words on the interent, I wonder why you would not give permission to show a video highlighting your physical abilities on the internet....unless you are a salesman of motion yourself?
Take Care
I was getting ready to write a similar response and am grateful you saved me the time. Robert moved better than most, sure it wasn't perfect but neither are the rest of us. I will say that in general he moved better than me.howardr said:In Defense of Robert
(who can adequately defend himself, I might add)
What did you think was so poor about Robert's movement? You claim that he violates many of Mr. Parker's principles. I'd certainly like to see you back up that accusation (I subscribe to a different approach to Kenpo than Robert, but given the modality he subscribes to, I'm not really clear what you are getting at). Sure, we can nitpick a particular instance of anyone's execution, but what does that really tell us about the person's skill? It's certainly not that his movement was anywhere near the poor examples we have from alleged "masters," such as Spry. Robert doesn't hold himself out to be a master (in fact he's self-deprecatingly referred to his own abilities on many occasions), nor should that (that he isn't a "master") be an impediment to the valid criticism he often presents. That criticism should stand or fall on its own merits.
Some other things to keep in mind:
- he's on video in front of an audience; that's quite a bit of pressure, and I'm sure my movement would substantially degrade in similar circumstances (I'd hope that viewers would be gracious in their evaluations)
- he didn't start Kenpo as a child but as an adult; he's obviously doing pretty damn well for someone starting later in life
- he's performing a fairly complex routine
- that was several years ago; he's likely progressed from the skill level demonstrated on the video
Given the above considerations, I find it somewhat disturbing that personal criticism is leveled so easily. The fact is we don't know how far Robert was come in his movement from first starting Kenpo, but I only imagine it's a stupendously long way (given his own descriptions). He certainly moves a lot better than much of what I've seen out there, especially for someone of his age and for someone who has indicated that his isn't naturally talented in these sort of physical arts. I say good show!
ps, please don't take the references to "age" as any sort of knock. It isn't. It's just the simple recognition that physically intense and sophisticated activities, such as Kenpo, can be substantially more difficult the older we get, and are certainly more difficult if started as a mature adult.
In addition, I think we should keep something else in mind that's relevant here. Yes, Robert has criticized certain Kenpo methodologies for introducing or advocating improper mechanics and principles (or excising proper ones) into their base curriculum (basics, sets, techniques, forms, etc.) for any number of dubious reasons (it's faster; it's "original"; it's more "street effective"; etc.). To my mind, such criticism does NOT mean that Robert is saying that in any particular application or encounter (or demonstration in front of an audience for that matter) that a pracititioner (which would include himself) will flawlessly enact all such principles and mechanics. What he's saying is that we shouldn't throw them out from the get-go. We should train in a certain manner, so that when actually applied under stress something functional, even if not perfect, will come out. That seems eminently reasonable to me, and exactly what Robert's been consistently advocating for some time now.Kenpodoc said:I was getting ready to write a similar response and am grateful you saved me the time. Robert moved better than most, sure it wasn't perfect but neither are the rest of us. I will say that in general he moved better than me.
Robert you should be proud of what you did. No appologies necessary for not reaching perfection.
I've criticised other videos I've seen on the internet because they are presented as the ideal and yet are severely flawed. Robert's performance was not ideal but it was good Kenpo.
Respectfully,
Jeff :asian:
Robert doesn't hold himself out to be a master (in fact he's self-deprecatingly referred to his own abilities on many occasions), nor should that (that he isn't a "master") be an impediment to the valid criticism he often presents. That criticism should stand or fall on its own merits.
Sure stress sucks, but if you can't combat the adrenal dump in a non-threatening situation what do you think will happen when someone is actually trying to hurt you. Besides why do we all have to qualify everything. You either did well or you did poorly.- he's on video in front of an audience; that's quite a bit of pressure, and I'm sure my movement would substantially degrade in similar circumstances (I'd hope that viewers would be gracious in their evaluations)
What are you his mom? Robert levels attacks against people and organizations all the time, throughout various forums. He's a grown man. Let him stick up for himself.Given the above considerations, I find it somewhat disturbing that personal criticism is leveled so easily. The fact is we don't know how far Robert was come in his movement from first starting Kenpo, but I only imagine it's a stupendously long way (given his own descriptions).
That's not saying all that much. We've all scene the Kenpo- CA-CA out there on the web. My gripe is that if you want to level criticism about how everyone else is working out or executing material than be prepared for scrutiny. If you can't stand the pressure then you are just another paper-warrior and we already have too many of those.He certainly moves a lot better than much of what I've seen out there, especially for someone of his age and for someone who has indicated that his isn't naturally talented in these sort of physical arts. I say good show!
Ouch! I'm glad there isn't a video of me on the Web! I mean, sure, the better you are yourself at executing the material, the more weight we might ascribe to your views. However, it's not like Robert executed it like this.Kenpo Yahoo said:The criticism means more from someone that can actually execute the material in a proficient manner. This is kinda like taking investment advice from someone who always loses money in the market. They sure can talk a good game, but if they know so much why aren't they doing it themselves.
Sure, that's true. Just saying under stress, it's not going to come out as "pretty" as it's going to under non-stressed pristine circumstances.Sure stress sucks, but if you can't combat the adrenal dump in a non-threatening situation what do you think will happen when someone is actually trying to hurt you. Besides why do we all have to qualify everything. You either did well or you did poorly.
I responded because it seemed like he was being attacked unfairly. Anything wrong with that?What are you his mom? Robert levels attacks against people and organizations all the time, throughout various forums. He's a grown man. Let him stick up for himself.
Sure, be prepared for scrutinty. However, Robert's interlocutor made snipes without backing them up. I responded and asked for clarification. So far, an explanation has not been forthcoming.That's not saying all that much. We've all scene the Kenpo- CA-CA out there on the web. My gripe is that if you want to level criticism about how everyone else is working out or executing material than be prepared for scrutiny. If you can't stand the pressure then you are just another paper-warrior and we already have too many of those.
The title of this thread was not "What is Robert doing wrong?" That can be saved for other threads I'm am just tired of various people, who at this point will remain nameless, throwing out endless criticisms of what others are doing but don't seem to like it when their efforts are scrutinized. Big mouths make big targets.howardr
Sure, be prepared for scrutinty. However, Robert's interlocutor made snipes without backing them up. I responded and asked for clarification. So far, an explanation has not been forthcoming.
If you say so....Robert
you have no idea what you're talking about.
I can believe that.Personally, I'm rather more interested in--and proud of--the fact that I have several students who are far more dynamic and charismatic in public than I am.
Never said you had a lousy teacher, but that reminds me of a college class I took. The professor was brilliant, PhD from MIT and all that, but half the class failed while the other half had 'A' averages. That doesn't mean the professor was bad, does it? By the way, mat time means nothing. It's what you are doing with your time while on the mat that makes a difference.Still, I do want to encourage you to consider me a paper tiger. (It's probably because of my lousy teachers, weak opponents, and lack of mat time.)
I guess we will just have to wait and see now won't we.... :uhyeah:I suspect you know better; but then, I suspect that you are showing just what sort of influence you plan to be on American kenpo
So, are you going to create a better Kenpo based on the teachings of Paul Mills?Kenpo Yahoo said:The title of this thread was not "What is Robert doing wrong?" That can be saved for other threads I'm am just tired of various people, who at this point will remain nameless, throwing out endless criticisms of what others are doing but don't seem to like it when their efforts are scrutinized. Big mouths make big targets.
If you say so....
I can believe that.
Never said you had a lousy teacher, but that reminds me of a college class I took. The professor was brilliant, PhD from MIT and all that, but half the class failed while the other half had 'A' averages. That doesn't mean the professor was bad, does it? By the way, mat time means nothing. It's what you are doing with your time while on the mat that makes a difference.
I guess we will just have to wait and see now won't we.... :uhyeah:
No, but I will call people to the floor that have no skill yet try to make everyone else feel dumb simply because they don't agree with what's being done or said.So, are you going to create a better Kenpo based on the teachings of Paul Mills?
MJS said:Mod. Note.
Please, keep the conversation polite and respectful.
-MJS
-MT Moderator-