https://www.sciencenews.org/article...-why-6-feet-may-not-be-enough-social-distance
This article suggest that being within 23 feet of a person you can still get droplets on them.
Is 6 feet far enough for social distancing? Here's what science says
This article slightly contradicts that one-acknowledges the MIT study, but then states that the study does not prove they're still infectious. However, it also states that the 6 feet is not a magic number, where you can still get infected farther away, and refers a couple time to 'a minimum of 6 feet' or '6-10 feet'. Either way, 6 feet isn't going to make it so you can't spread the virus if you have it but or asymptomatic (and keep in mind that the beginning periods of the virus-where most people are symptomatic, is when it most easily spreads). Of note, it also mentions another thing not brought up here-face masks alone are not enough to stop the spread-you still need to social distance on top of it.
The point is-you should do both, since neither is fully effective on their own. You don't have to, as skribs pointed it out, no one is going to force you. But if you don't do so with the knowledge that you may unknowingly spread the disease, which may end up either killing someone, or having it spread to other people and killing one or more people that way. But if you're fine with people dying because you weren't as careful as you could be, then go for it. And yes, we all take that risk for every virus/flu around, but moreso when it is impacting up large percentages of the population (One county is already at 14%, while others are above 5%), and will only impact larger percentages as time goes on.
This article suggest that being within 23 feet of a person you can still get droplets on them.
Is 6 feet far enough for social distancing? Here's what science says
This article slightly contradicts that one-acknowledges the MIT study, but then states that the study does not prove they're still infectious. However, it also states that the 6 feet is not a magic number, where you can still get infected farther away, and refers a couple time to 'a minimum of 6 feet' or '6-10 feet'. Either way, 6 feet isn't going to make it so you can't spread the virus if you have it but or asymptomatic (and keep in mind that the beginning periods of the virus-where most people are symptomatic, is when it most easily spreads). Of note, it also mentions another thing not brought up here-face masks alone are not enough to stop the spread-you still need to social distance on top of it.
The point is-you should do both, since neither is fully effective on their own. You don't have to, as skribs pointed it out, no one is going to force you. But if you don't do so with the knowledge that you may unknowingly spread the disease, which may end up either killing someone, or having it spread to other people and killing one or more people that way. But if you're fine with people dying because you weren't as careful as you could be, then go for it. And yes, we all take that risk for every virus/flu around, but moreso when it is impacting up large percentages of the population (One county is already at 14%, while others are above 5%), and will only impact larger percentages as time goes on.