A small percentage isnāt the same thing as a small number.well IF 80% of people dont develop symptoms, that only leaves 20% of people who do, only a small % will get really sick
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A small percentage isnāt the same thing as a small number.well IF 80% of people dont develop symptoms, that only leaves 20% of people who do, only a small % will get really sick
That is a side effect I wish we had better statistics for. It almost certainly exists, but we donāt know how much of an increase there has been.Well, on the flipside, we have the issues of quarantine. Depression, suicide, domestic violence, crime are all up. People are scared to go to the hospital and are dying of treatable diseases at home.
This is what I've heard from the doctors and nurses at my dojang.
it can beA small percentage isnāt the same thing as a small number.
If the population in question isnāt large, or the percentage is very small.it can be
using undefined terms like ''small number'' is a weak argument, even weaker than the term small %If the population in question isnāt large, or the percentage is very small.
But ācould beā is pretty weak in this case.
the uk government have continued their policy of just making things up on the fly.
having previously discounted the idea of face masks as ineffective and counter productive they are now requiring people to wear them on public transport...
its so bizarrely unspecific you could wear much what you wantWear a killer clown mask (like your avatar). If anyone complains, you are just following regulation!
its so bizarrely unspecific you could wear much what you want
...the ever helpful bbc has a web page with pictures on how to make a mask out of a shirt, first cut a piece out of the t shirt, then tie round mouth
There you go again, deflecting from your lack of logic and reason by playing semantic games. The term is relative, and you absolutely understand it. You just pretend it's complicated and difficult to understand, rather than admitting you mixed up percentages and actual numbers.using undefined terms like ''small number'' is a weak argument, even weaker than the term small %
In many cases, this is progression of understanding. Masks aren't terribly effective (for folks not used to wearing them) at reducing the chance of getting infected. They are more effective (even home-made cloth masks) at preventing outward transmission.the uk government have continued their policy of just making things up on the fly.
having previously discounted the idea of face masks as ineffective and counter productive they are now requiring people to wear them on public transport, but as actual masks are very difficult to get hold of, the government requirement is that you should tie a duster or other large weave piece of cloth round your face like a highway man or be fined, highway robbery indeed
of course its a relative term, thats the problem, what its relative TO, is known only to you and subject to change to fit what ever point your failing to makeThere you go again, deflecting from your lack of logic and reason by playing semantic games. The term is relative, and you absolutely understand it. You just pretend it's complicated and difficult to understand, rather than admitting you mixed up percentages and actual numbers.
In many cases, this is progression of understanding. Masks aren't terribly effective (for folks not used to wearing them) at reducing the chance of getting infected. They are more effective (even home-made cloth masks) at preventing outward transmission.
on a loose weave like say a duster, its just going to build up a concentration of virus on the outside of the cloth , meaning that anyone close is going to get a big hitIn many cases, this is progression of understanding. Masks aren't terribly effective (for folks not used to wearing them) at reducing the chance of getting infected. They are more effective (even home-made cloth masks) at preventing outward transmission.
A build-up on the outside would perhaps be a problem if you sneezed, or such. I don't know if the virus is dislodged easily enough for anything short of a sneeze to make it airborn. If not, people nearby aren't in much danger - certainly probably less than simply breathing in the virus you exhale (rather than it getting lodged somewhere on the mask). Looser weaves will be less effective, but I haven't seen a model or any data to suggest where the line of ineffectiveness might lie.on a loose weave like say a duster, its just going to build up a concentration of virus on the outside of the cloth , meaning that anyone close is going to get a big hit
people two meters away may be safer, but the reason for wearing them is your going to be cheek by jowl with people on a crowded train
its in a fine mist that has soaked in to the cloth, of course it will be come airborn, if some one decided to hold a flem soaked handkerchief 6 inches from your mouth would you consider that safe ?A build-up on the outside would perhaps be a problem if you sneezed, or such. I don't know if the virus is dislodged easily enough for anything short of a sneeze to make it airborn. If not, people nearby aren't in much danger - certainly probably less than simply breathing in the virus you exhale (rather than it getting lodged somewhere on the mask). Looser weaves will be less effective, but I haven't seen a model or any data to suggest where the line of ineffectiveness might lie.
If George Floyd is tested positive, should those 4 police officers be infected?airborn.
So, you meant folks within 6 inches of your face? Yeah, they're probably in trouble. As for the rest, I go with what the scientists say, rather than your rantings. By the way, I'm not even sure what a duster is. In the US, that'd be a thing (often made of feathers or a feather-like material) for dusting.its in a fine mist that has soaked in to the cloth, of course it will be come airborn, if some one decided to hold a flem soaked handkerchief 6 inches from your mouth would you consider that safe ?
coughing or sneezing THROUGH it will just make it worse
you do know how small these things are dont you ? they are not going to be filtered by a duster
What is the point of this post?If George Floyd is tested positive, should those 4 police officers be infected?