I think you make some good points - the term 'motion kenpo' is certainly a loaded one. I think that problem is that when this term is used, it implies that motion is the only thing going on. But that's not true - the principles of body mechanics/physics are always present, and there will always be those that have better (or worse) understanding of these principles. In addition some practioners decide to emphasise the underlying physical principles more than the movements they create, at least in the early stages of learning.
Exactly true! Also why I was "sticking up" for "motion kenpo" so to speak. I think those that have written what they have, the way they have (and they have!) need to understand that also.
