The only currently available stun gun I'd even begin to consider advising for a civilian is the
Taser C2. Currently, only Taser's products have the Neuromuscular Incapacitation effect of their shaped pulse. The C2 was designed as a throwaway; deploy it, and while the attacker is incapacitated, you run away. Even then, it requires an effective deployment and two probe hit under pressure with limited practice. A Taser isn't a bad thing to have -- but not something I'd heavily encourage, either.
I'm curious as to why you think the recommendation for a civilian is more limited? With proper training, I think a civilian could do just fine with the same equipment an LEO uses. I know a lot of prison guards who swear by them. Have you had bad experiences with stun guns?
Again, we have problems of deploying it under pressure, as well as requiring sufficient room to use it effectively. And it can VERY easily be lethal force. It's a freakin' metal pipe, certainly capable of doing "serious bodily harm."
Sans a spike ring, or chest mounted sensor operated machine gun, deploying a weapon under pressure is a universal problem. Also using ones own material under pressure is even a problem for most. I mentioned reach advantage here for a reason... Can definitely do serious bodily harm, most weapons worth using fit in this category.
Lights are something I strongly encourage. They're useful in dark places, they may blind an attacker (if you can lay hands on it, in a functional manner under pressure), and a few are even designed to have some enhancements for self defense.
Glad you like one thing on my list, lol.
"Piss off juice" is the best name I've heard for OC. Unreliable, and easily beaten by a determined assailant. That's if you can even find, grab, and functionally deploy it in the first place. If I could, I'd take it off my duty gear...
It's on your duty gear for a reason, it's been known to have a good use on certain occasions. Pepper spray is not usually a one shot solution, it's a window opener. Again, functional deployment is a universal issue. Agree to disagree I guess.
Knives are useful. Benchmade are decent, at a good price point -- but far from the only brand worth recommending. (I'm personally partial to Spyderco, and also their Byrd line. But that's just my own preferences.) And I'd encourage a knife that can be easily opened with one hand -- but also is useful as a tool, not merely a weapon. Also worth mentioning or recalling that a knife automatically means lethal force.
No, benchmades are the only brand worth buying...kidding. Of course there are others, I didn't think anyone would take me so literal as to think that is the only knife brand worth buying! I'm not a big fan of Spyderco, but to each his own. I'm also a lefty, and the axis lock is handy.
Practice and training in the use is important. It's also very important to couple carrying any sort of weapon with training and education on the use of force, and how to articulate your use of force.
Another thing we agree on. All too often people carry weapons they do not know how to use/deploy/retain, or are aware of the legal implications on presenting/using such a weapon. Articulating boundaries, etc. to a would-be assailant can be a great idea, especially loudly, so as to alert others it is not in fact a mutual combat situation. No matter how nice the Police Officer (i.e. friendly interrogator) seems, I would let your Attorney do any articulating re your use of force after the fact. Very explicitly invoke your right to counsel, then questions must cease ("I think I need an attorney" doesn't cut it).
So anyhow Jim, I know what you think of my list, what is your list? Just blade, light...firearm?
best,
G