Well for one thing unlike Commodus who inherited his office, Obama was elected by the people.
Yup, a popular and electoral majority. That's democracy in action.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well for one thing unlike Commodus who inherited his office, Obama was elected by the people.
Yup, a popular and electoral majority. That's democracy in action.
Stepping slightly away from topic for a second just to share a whole-hearted agreement on that very important sentiment.
That hardly explains the Obama phenomenon.....lots of famous folks.....but your politics have to be right (left) to revered as the 2nd COMING!Oh yes! We seem to be turning into celebrity worshipping societies, anyone who is even slightly famous for nothing seems to be worshipped now. When someone can become famous and 'worshipped' for just going out with a 'celebrity' its probably no wonder that Obama is seen as the new sun king.
He won an election.....as Presidents have before.....yet, we usually wait until AFTER they've done something of significance before putting their face on Mount Rushmore.Yup, a popular and electoral majority. That's democracy in action.
Depends on whos writing the history, Richard the Third is forever thought of as a wicked hunchback king thanks to Elizabethans writing the history after the Tudors stole the throne. He was neither hunchbacked or wicked, in fact he was one of the best kings we had, Richard the Lionheart is thought of as a great English king when he was actually a gay Frenchman who bled England dry with taxes and spent barely any time in the country. King John his brother is thought of as wicked too but was a better king.
I wonder though if Bush will actually be judged on his term in office or whether he will be remembered for his Bushisms which seem to be everywhere over the past few days!
What makes sense is to wait until AFTER someone is successful as President before declaring them the greatest president that ever lived.....Sshhh!!! They'll hear you making sense. Must not make sense. SSHHH!!! :lol2:
He won an election.....as Presidents have before.....yet, we usually wait until AFTER they've done something of significance before putting their face on Mount Rushmore.
Historically great Presidents, including Ronald Reagan, required several years of hindsight AFTER leaving office to be declared great.
I suspect history will judge George W. Bush much more kindly than many think (or would like). Distance of time tends to eliminate the trivialities (such as the Bushisms) that seem of such great importance.
Well when he does something other than get elected to public office, let me know.Okay, we all get that Bush fans are cool enough to have been this happy that their leader got elected and talk about all the great things he was going to do but Obama fans aren't. Belly stars and all that stuff. We get it.
Well, unlike some folks looking for a savior, I don't need Obama to inspire me......I'd have voted for Bob Barr if I had thought he had a chance of winning......Governed LEAST is Governed BEST.......especially since the current financial crisis was CREATED by the government you government that says it's now going to solve it.Don't anyone be inspired now. That's a bad thing. Don't anyone start complimenting the man on his ability to inspire because that's a bad thing. Don't overestimate him before he's even started his job because that's something only the cool people do. :barf:
*On to the discussion*
I don't know if it's a good move, but he can't avoid it after his campaign of RAINBOWS and MESSIANIC declarations....NOW he HAS to say 'Well.....uhm......we.....uhm.....really can't do all that as....quickly......as.....uhm.....you know......it's tough......it's......uhm.......yeah, I know I promised pie in the sky fixes,......but, uhm.......it's gonna take a while'.I think it was a good move, popularity-wise, for Obama to warn that this will be a long process. It will ensure high approval numbers for a long time even if he doesn't do anything too constructive. There are a lot of blind followers - ON BOTH SIDES - and I'm curious how long it will take before they wake up. For the Obamayans (my word ) it might be a rude awakening, but only if he's as middle-of-the-road in some ways as he campaigned to be.
We'll see.
I would prefer people to have a healthy contempt and suspicion for their politicians. Not the blind, rabid hatred shown to Bush and certainly not the glazzy-eyed adulation shown to incoming "President Jesus".
I haven't been this creeped out since people started wearing those yellow Lance Armstrong wristbands. Buncha Moonies.
There are those who are different......lately the reason why BOTH of our parties sound like the same, is that they are both ACTING like it.....the differences between McCain and Obama are pretty darn negligible when you get right down to it.....they both think growing the government and spending money are the cures to America's problems.The political parties talk up their candidates as the next great thing, the ones who'll solve all their problems, most of us are sceptical but there is a need in people these days for someone they can follow, someone who can inspire them. it's a yearning that may not be fulfilled but it's there.
Reagan DESERVES to be idolized......AFTER THE FACT, years now removed......he 'EARNED' it, it wasn't handed to him on day one
As I said, leaders deserve to be idolized IN HINDSIGHT only....usually after they are dead and gone.....never while they hold the rings of power if we wish to remain a free people.Whilst Ronnie Raygun was far from the buffoon he was often portrayed as (I've seen some quite insightful political seminars of his), he, like any President (or indeed any leader) is there as the accountable head of the machine of government. They take the credit for other peoples labours and accidents of timing/fortune and also need to take the blame when the machine fails in it's intent.
To idolise any such leader is a dangerous thing to my mind, it being all too easy to slip into the dogmatic trap of obeisance to 'the Leader', whether past or, even more worryingly, present.
Even the much feted Winston Churchill doesn't get elevated to such status and quite rightly so.
Men in positions of apparent power all too often are not the masters of their own destiny but are more akin to jugglers of counterveiling interest groups - that needs to be borne in mind by us all when we villify or venerate politicians.
Okay, I know that I'm English and therefore find aspects of the 'public' behaviours of celebrity American's somewhat cringe-making but that was just ... unsettling? Is that the word I mean? It'll do for now.
There was nothing wrong with the sentiments expressed, a persons feelings and beliefs are their own after all. Indeed, many of the statements were postive and uplifting but so many stitched togther for over four minutes with continuous interjections of "I pledge ..." was disturbing.
The person who decided on that ending to the footage was perhaps sending a message of their own too. I can't be the only person who was hearing a subtext of:
"We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to serve us".