MSUTKD
Purple Belt
Because it closes the door for hopeful top competitors, whether you see it that way or not...
Can you give a specific example of how this would close a door for a top competitor?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because it closes the door for hopeful top competitors, whether you see it that way or not...
Can you give a specific example of how this would close a door for a top competitor?
I'm gonna go with this one.The problem is that the coaching staff making the choices regarding which athletes make the team have a financial stake in the decision. The national team coaches each run training facilities and develop athletes. If they are responsible for choosing the members of the team, who do you think they are going to choose...the up-and-coming unknown athlete or one of their athletes? If an independent selection team was established, then you are right in saying that no one should be shut out or affected in any way. Other organizations that use a team selection camp process also have an independent and unbiased selection team to choose the athletes. Unfortunately, that is not current political landscape at USAT.
In turn, this affects the organization because it presents the appearance of impropriety, whether that impropriety exists or not. That turns people off from becoming members because the organization seems to favor select groups within the general membership. Why do coaches and parents want their players to compete at USAT? To compete against the best and possibly make a team some day. That dream doesn't exist if there isn't a level playing field to select teams. Why should coaches and parents waste their time and resouces on an organization that favors a select few? It could be their player that one day gets shut out of the process.
The problem is that the coaching staff making the choices regarding which athletes make the team have a financial stake in the decision. The national team coaches each run training facilities and develop athletes. If they are responsible for choosing the members of the team, who do you think they are going to choose...the up-and-coming unknown athlete or one of their athletes? If an independent selection team was established, then you are right in saying that no one should be shut out or affected in any way. Other organizations that use a team selection camp process also have an independent and unbiased selection team to choose the athletes. Unfortunately, that is not current political landscape at USAT.
In turn, this affects the organization because it presents the appearance of impropriety, whether that impropriety exists or not. That turns people off from becoming members because the organization seems to favor select groups within the general membership. Why do coaches and parents want their players to compete at USAT? To compete against the best and possibly make a team some day. That dream doesn't exist if there isn't a level playing field to select teams. Why should coaches and parents waste their time and resouces on an organization that favors a select few? It could be their player that one day gets shut out of the process.
MANY US sports have the coaches picking the team, soccer for one. Don't blame the USAT, blame US sports. Like I said before, if you are at the top then we will talk until then train harder than your competition, beat top fighters, prove yourself at camps and you WILL have a chance to make the team. The USAT is not doing anything to you that most Olympic sports donÂ’t do; try and make the US soccer team.
Ok..my mistake. I thought one of the qualifiers were done away with.State qualifiers are still being used.
The way it is now nationals mean nothing. Even if you win they do not have to take you. So what everyone is up in arms about is why even compete if winning may not even get you anything. Before if you won you at least had to chance to go to team trials and maybe win a spot if you won. Now that is done away with. To me this is a conflict of interest, making the selection process tainted for this sport.Ok..my mistake. I thought one of the qualifiers were done away with.
So with that said, doesn't the athlete now have to fight through state to get to the nationals? So in essence it isn't just one fight that determines if a guy gets to be on the olympic team. Most likely it is someone who has fought amongst the best to be where he/she is. So again why is the new system better?
I
All this bashing the NGB is counterproductive and misleading; couldÂ’a -wouldÂ’a-shouldÂ’a does not cut it. If you have a specific example of how YOU are hurt by this process then make your thoughts known. Many of us actually in the game would probably come to your aid. Speculation about what might happen is for soothsayers not athletes. If you are not willing to work within the rules of the NGB, donÂ’t play.
You are still avoiding the issue that most people have a problem with. Having coaches pick a national team where they have their own fighters in the mix creates a conflict of interest on the part of the coaches. It seems as if you are denying this situation exists, because you want specific examples of athletes that have been affected. The perception of impropriety is often just as destructive as the existence of actual impropriety. USAT should be avoiding this at all costs as an organization. Please address these issues directly in future responses.
I am not debating whether it is better; it is a chosen methodology used by NGBÂ’s to help select the best teams and athletes to represent the US.
My point is: how does this even affect non-elite athletes complaining about it? They could still go to states or a qualifier, attend the national championships and have fun. They might even become national champions, an amazing feat in itself. To become a US Team member is very different.
That type of work ethic should be there from the get go and way before you get to US Team Trial.The next level is about more than being a good fighter or taekwondo practitioner. It is about a drive and work ethic that quite frankly most people do not have.
You cannot become an Olympic or World Champion working out for 1.5 hrs at night M-W-Fr.
I'm not arguing the point that camps are a good thing. Far from it. I'm just wondering why it has to be THEIR camp. What if I attended a camp taught by Sang Lee or Arlene Limas? Both who have been there done that and raised good fighters as well. Would that count?I think it is wonderful to have camps available to athletes who are willing to push themselves to the next level. They can prepare you for international competition and are taught by people who have been there; it raises the bar for our athletes. You also need knowledge of proper training methods, nutrition and modern taekwondo rules and tactics; what a great place to learn. These camps can also identify the strengths and weaknesses of the athlete and help them to benchmark themselves to other players.
The selection teams can also evaluate the mental/emotional stability of the athlete; very important due to the stress levels of practice/travel/competition.
I am not debating whether it is better; it is a chosen methodology used by NGB’s to help select the best teams and athletes to represent the US. Why do most US sports use a similar method? I would hope because it is working. My point is: how does this even affect non-elite athletes complaining about it? They could still go to states or a qualifier, attend the national championships and have fun. They might even become national champions, an amazing feat in itself. To become a US Team member is very different. The next level is about more than being a good fighter or taekwondo practitioner. It is about a drive and work ethic that quite frankly most people do not have. You cannot become an Olympic or World Champion working out for 1.5 hrs at night M-W-Fr.
I think it is wonderful to have camps available to athletes who are willing to push themselves to the next level. They can prepare you for international competition and are taught by people who have been there; it raises the bar for our athletes. You also need knowledge of proper training methods, nutrition and modern taekwondo rules and tactics; what a great place to learn. These camps can also identify the strengths and weaknesses of the athlete and help them to benchmark themselves to other players. The selection teams can also evaluate the mental/emotional stability of the athlete; very important due to the stress levels of practice/travel/competition. One of the greatest advantages of this method and the U24 idea is to create depth in our athletes. It gives those who are national level but not quite world class yet the chance for a better class of competition experience. These experiences will give USA taekwondo athletes a better chance to perform well at tougher competitions. The benefits of mandatory training camps far outweigh the cons, IMHO.
All this bashing the NGB is counterproductive and misleading; could’a -would’a-should’a does not cut it. If you have a specific example of how YOU are hurt by this process then make your thoughts known. Many of us actually in the game would probably come to your aid. Speculation about what might happen is for soothsayers not athletes. If you are not willing to work within the rules of the NGB, don’t play.
Sport competition in taekwondo is different than taekwondo in the dojang and hopefully always will be. The USAT is there to develop athletes; we are here to develop martial artists and potential athletes. Neither is against the other and both rely on each other; remember not all martial artists want to be athletes and not all athletes need to be martial artists. Some of us can be both and in that the conflict disappears.