michaeledward said:
Yes Pete .. it is very non-sensical ... but it happens. If you could not detect the dripping sarcasm and anger in my words when I called that "UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE", I apologize. Doctors will treat the sick and injured. This is especially true in emergency rooms. And when that happens, somebody pays for the service.
Certainly, I wouldn't call that universal health care. It's kind of like invading a country with enough soldiers to defeat the enemy army, but not to protect the citizenry in the aftermath.
Can the United States do better for all of its citizens? I believe we can. If you don't think that we, as a nation, can do better for each of us, please take a look at the man in the mirror and ask him why not.
Mike
Mike, the bit I'd like to address is underlined, but I didn't wan't to take it out of context.
Of course it can. So too can any country. Call me pessimistic, but I don't believe that there is any contemporary leader who can get the United States there, now, with respect to health care. Clearly, the position is about aquiring power. Not leading Americans to a better life.
Now of course, one candidate is better suited to begin walking the path than the other. That's a no brainer. But by the time they begin the journey, the mandate's up, a government changes, and nothing is accomplished. I know its cynical, but you know its true.
Putting your money on a long term goal, in a Western Democratic/Capitalistic system, is a long, long term investment. And its still 50/50 as to whether or not there'll be a payoff.
The money's just not there right now. How many tens of billions are you guys spending internationally right now? Where can the funding come from? Who's ready for a tax hike?
We pay a ton in Canada for our "healthcare". And the system is a mess. The cost goes up and up and up. And when the current gov't needs to shave a bit out of the budget, they're the ones (health care) who don't get funding increases to keep up with inflation. Yet we're coming to a point in the demographic cycle when there is NO OTHER program that requires greater attention, and access to funding.
I just think the timing's wrong. Particularly in the context of the current American debt load/ deficit budget history.
Dan