KenpoDave
3rd Black Belt
Goldendragon7 said:Creativity for whom........ Al Tracy or the students?
The students. You cannnot be truly creative until you have studied the whole of the subject. Look at Bruce Lee. He created Jeet Kune Do using principles that are available in most systems, but he did not have the full knowledge of the system, or the discipline to stick with one, so he made stuff up. He was right, but his concepts were not unique.
A} Who said anyone was limiting exposure to techniques???....... just because the base system of EPAK has fewer techniques doesn't mean there is less exposure being taught. (Granted .... this all depends on the individual instructors methods)
I agree. It does, however, depend on the individual instructors doing a lot or research formulation on their own. Which leads to the part you put in parentheses!
True, he did evolve to those.... it was a PROCESS for sure (and much detailed refinment to that process occured in the 80's).
What I infer here is that you are saying that Ed Parker created the master keys and the 154 techniques. I could be wrong. But, I thought that Ed Parker started with a much larger framework, 400 techniques to shodan if memory serves, and pared the system down from there.
Al Tracy did not create a system with 600 techniques, but rather was taught one, and chose to stick with it when Ed Parker began to change things. He did not accept Ed Parker's paring down. EPAK is not the tree from which the Tracy's apple fell. EPAK is an apple that fell off the tree of kenpo. It was mentioned that we may be missing the forest for the trees. I would submit that many EPAK practitioners think EPAK is the forest, when it is in reality a tree. As is Tracy's, as is the IKCA. Kenpo is the forest. And we could expand on that into oblivion, but I think you get the point.
My point is simply that the tools that Ed Parker used to refine his system were tools he developed from kenpo. The kenpo that someone else taught him, and the kenpo he taught to his early students before he formed EPAK. Al Tracy chose to stick with the original kenpo that Parker taught.
If I seem defensive, it is because the EPAK group always treats every other kenpo system as if it is somehow less. EPAK reminds me of Jeet Kune Do in that it was Ed Parker's current understanding of kenpo at the time of his death. Ever the innovator, I imagine that 15 years later, he would be different. To move the art forward from that point, you can't just jump in where Ed Parker was. You have to start where he started.
:asian: